

The second-graders had forgotten how to pass a ball.

Not a complex ball—a playground ball, the kind you buy in bulk from a catalog. We spent three weeks on it that spring. Passing in a circle. Passing while walking. Passing without talking, then passing with specific phrases: "Ready?" "Got it." "My turn." The unit was called "Team Building," though the real work beneath that label was teaching twelve children how to occupy the same space without touching each other, how to read the body language of the person holding the ball, how to wait without焦虑—not exactly anxiety but something adjacent to it, a kind of low-grade social panic that six-year-olds carry in their shoulders.

This did not translate to remote. I cannot say it more plainly than that. We tried. I held up a ball to my laptop screen and watched seventeen faces stare back at me, waiting for instructions on how to feel like a group. The bandwidth could not carry the thing that happens when bodies learn together in a room—the way Marcus finally stopped flinching when the ball came toward him, the way Priya started saying "good pass" unprompted, the way the whole unit was not really about balls at all but about something harder to name.

The white-collar world is having its argument now. Offices versus home. Productivity versus culture. The people who missed the water cooler and the people who found it toxic, both sides certain their experience is universal. But the rest of the economy already ran this experiment. We called it school. The results were messy and obvious in ways that had nothing to do with test scores, and they were ignored because the subjects were children—a population that does not vote, does not unionize effectively, and cannot file economic impact reports about their own attention spans.