From 08588361a54799fb58cf7e89ab288300ab86a550 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Levi Neuwirth Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2026 10:41:30 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] docs(lane): point at teardown framing revision 9 The held lane still identified the teardown framing as revision 8, so the approved state was not portable from this branch. Revision 9 adds the total run classifier, the void budget, the endpoint verdict table, the bisect-step policy and counterbalanced ordering --- none of which a reader arriving here would have found. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai --- docs/active-work.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/active-work.md b/docs/active-work.md index 494f06b..133b2fa 100644 --- a/docs/active-work.md +++ b/docs/active-work.md @@ -500,8 +500,8 @@ from #171 and #215. enumerated with its own log digest in the teardown lane's `docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`. - **The defect now has its own lane: - `gpu-probe-sigint-teardown`** (pushed; framing revision 8 at - `docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md` (revision 8), run provenance at + `gpu-probe-sigint-teardown`** (pushed; framing revision 9 at + `docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md` (revision 9), run provenance at `docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`). **ยง5b is held behind it.** That lane's framing supersedes every diagnostic claim below; the entries here are kept only as the record of how it was found.