From 756c2b87df7b2aa82dc3232255a8238b17413659 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Levi Neuwirth Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2026 19:15:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] docs(ci-reds): bound R7 window without misnaming its endpoint The four-run observation window contains two green in-gate runs, so it cannot be described as ending at the first green. Name it directly as the first four in-gate runs; the timestamps continue to define the boundary exactly and later verification gates remain excluded. --- docs/ci-red-signatures.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/ci-red-signatures.md b/docs/ci-red-signatures.md index 7d8a315..255767f 100644 --- a/docs/ci-red-signatures.md +++ b/docs/ci-red-signatures.md @@ -561,8 +561,8 @@ isolate an in-gate cause. All these runs establish is that none of the four conditions **by itself** reproduces the failure. They do not show that any of them is uninvolved when the gate supplies the rest. -**THE OBSERVATION WINDOW IS BOUNDED, deliberately.** It is the four -in-gate runs of 2026-08-29 up to and including the first green — +**THE OBSERVATION WINDOW IS BOUNDED, deliberately.** It is the first +four in-gate runs of 2026-08-29 — `20260829T144541Z`, `T150011Z`, `T152024Z`, `T152824Z` — plus the 17 out-of-gate runs taken between them. **Later head-exact verification gates on this lane are NOT part of it and do not move these numbers.**