From 80b3dcf8973caaa431dd35966dc6ee709f670995 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Levi Neuwirth Date: Sun, 9 Aug 2026 22:29:20 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] docs: the suite is 25, not 26 The previous round left the suite at 24 and this round adds one test, so it is 25. grep -c on the test attribute confirms 25 and the run reports 25/25. The bullet said 26, and I repeated it upstream without counting. The entry now shows the arithmetic --- 24 before, plus one --- rather than just a corrected number, and names the earlier figure so a reader who saw it does not treat this as a second suite. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai --- docs/active-work.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/active-work.md b/docs/active-work.md index 5a5e58c..8fb9121 100644 --- a/docs/active-work.md +++ b/docs/active-work.md @@ -503,7 +503,9 @@ the authoritative tip** — the ref, not a SHA. Recover with would have made the divergence unassertable. - **A new test asserts both directions, positive and negative** (`the_two_utf8_refusals_each_name_the_surface_their_own_text_reaches`, - 26 in the suite): the process message contains `pmacs.process.list` + 25 in the suite — 24 before this round, plus this one; an earlier + revision of this bullet said 26): the process message contains + `pmacs.process.list` and **not** `*workers*`/`modeline`; the job message contains both of those and **not** `pmacs.process.list`. The existing row-table assertion in `spawning_without_a_real_purpose_is_refused_and_starts_nothing`