From bd595bd1481ca633c543b003212fdee909c12a07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Levi Neuwirth Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 21:15:49 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] docs(framing): revision 19 --- reconcile two lineages that both said 13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit `docs/gui-stage1-input-framing.md` was advanced independently by two branches and both called their change "revision 13". gui-stage1b-pointer-scroll 13->18 adds §2a, 503 lines: six corrections, B1's wheel-target enumeration, Q#S1-11 ruled (B), the lifetime contract with L1-L8 --- APPROVED at 18 panel-replay lane (1fc3af6) its 13 the enriched B1/B2/B3 rows and the "Panel-replay consequence" paragraph --- approved by merge in #243, status line never updated Both are kept in full, verified rather than assumed: the enriched rows, the panel-replay paragraph, `wrap pins horizontal origin to zero`, §2a, the six-target enumeration and L1-L8 are all present after the rebase. Nothing is renumbered retroactively --- rewriting those numbers would falsify sentences like revision 15's "three defects in 14", and the duplicate is recorded instead. They turn out to be complementary. The panel-replay row names three residual owners; §2a's model is a superset that adds the TERMINAL and rules that chrome shares the DOCUMENT's residual. Where they do disagree, §2a wins, as §1b's own blockquote already said. Rebased onto 0ec13b3. The branch's stale copies of active-work.md and ci-red-signatures.md were resolved toward main, which is 167 commits newer; both are now byte-identical to main. --- docs/gui-stage1-input-framing.md | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/gui-stage1-input-framing.md b/docs/gui-stage1-input-framing.md index d8e31c7..355c722 100644 --- a/docs/gui-stage1-input-framing.md +++ b/docs/gui-stage1-input-framing.md @@ -1,6 +1,41 @@ # GUI arc, Stage 1 — input foundation (framing) -**Status: revision 18 — APPROVED (2026-08-14).** §2a is the 1b ground +**Status: revision 19 — RECONCILES TWO LINEAGES THAT BOTH NUMBERED +THEMSELVES 13.** This document was advanced independently by two +branches, and both called their change "revision 13" — the second +block at `revision 13` below is the other lineage's, left exactly as it +was written. **Nothing is renumbered retroactively**, because rewriting +those numbers would falsify sentences like revision 15's "three defects +in 14". + +| lineage | revisions | contribution | approval | +|---|---|---|---| +| `gui-stage1b-pointer-scroll` | 13 → 18 | **§2a, 503 lines** — six corrections, B1's wheel-target enumeration, Q#S1-11 ruled (B, viewport only), the five-clause lifetime contract with L1–L8 | **APPROVED at 18** | +| the panel-replay lane (`1fc3af6`, #243) | its own 13 | the enriched **B1/B2/B3 rows** and the 12-line "Panel-replay consequence" paragraph in §1b | **approved by merge** — #243 landed it on `main`; its status line was never updated and still reads "AWAITING APPROVAL" | + +**Both are kept in full, and that was verified rather than assumed:** +the enriched rows, the panel-replay paragraph, `wrap pins horizontal +origin to zero`, §2a, the six-target enumeration and L1–L8 are all +present after the rebase. + +**They are complementary, and the one place they could have collided is +worth naming.** The panel-replay lane's B1 row names **three** residual +owners — primary document, panel document, minimap. §2a's model is a +**superset**: R2 panel, R3 terminal, R4 document *(sharing chrome's +residual)*, R5 minimap. So §2a adds the **terminal** as an owner and +**rules that chrome shares the document's**; it does not overturn the +three the table names. + +**Where the table and §2a disagree, §2a wins**, exactly as §1b's own +blockquote already says: it replaces B1's undefined "surface" with the +enumeration and B3's "content bounds" with B7's saturated upper bound. +The enriched rows stand for everything else they add — notably B2's +window-targeted `view_left` path and B3's wrap-pins-to-zero. + +**Nothing in revision 19 changes a ruling.** It is a reconciliation and +a record. + +**Previously, revision 18 — APPROVED (2026-08-14).** §2a is the 1b ground truth and its rulings are settled: **Q#S1-11 (B)**, the five-clause lifetime contract with witnesses L1–L8, B1's six-target enumeration with discriminators **R1–R5**, and B3's exact saturated bound. Revision @@ -126,6 +161,10 @@ another framing deliberately deferred**. Its claim that the snap-back lands on the next *caret event* was corrected by 14 to the next **paint**, and by 15 to *per-frontend* drivers. +**Previously, revision 13 (the PANEL-REPLAY lineage) — approved by +merge in #243; the status line it shipped with is preserved verbatim +below and was never updated.** + **Status: revision 13 — AWAITING APPROVAL with bottom-panel §5a revision 16.** Revision 13 changes no previously ruled outcome. It makes B1–B3's “per surface” scope explicit for the panel-document