From c8ae975ed938e1256b44038bcca1944d60381555 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Levi Neuwirth Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 18:03:52 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] docs(lane): the ancestry pair is non-comparable; point at revision 7 Two corrections. - This ledger still said 72da24a being an ancestor of the passing 7599661 while failing today is something "no source-monotonic cause explains". Withdrawn: the two observations differ in commit AND environment AND time, so they are non-comparable and support no causal conclusion of any kind. Different commits can deterministically produce different outcomes, so the pair says nothing about determinism either. - It identified the teardown lane's framing as revision 5; the portable lane is revision 7. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai --- docs/active-work.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/active-work.md b/docs/active-work.md index 634328f..8bd3c61 100644 --- a/docs/active-work.md +++ b/docs/active-work.md @@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ from #171 and #215. `docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`. - **The defect now has its own lane: `gpu-probe-sigint-teardown`** (pushed; framing revision 5 at - `docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md` (revision 5), run provenance at + `docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md` (revision 7, `e2084fb`+), run provenance at `docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`). **ยง5b is held behind it.** That lane's framing supersedes every diagnostic claim below; the entries here are kept only as the record of how it was found.