diff --git a/docs/active-work.md b/docs/active-work.md
index ea073cd..9110109 100644
--- a/docs/active-work.md
+++ b/docs/active-work.md
@@ -280,11 +280,13 @@ from #171 and #215.
   `/home/jeans/Repos/personal/pmacs-probe-sigint`. Recover with
   `git fetch githubsucks && git checkout gpu-probe-sigint-teardown`.
 - **No PR. Framing revision 10 at `docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md`,
-  AWAITING APPROVAL** — revision 9 was approved at `15c25ec`, but that
-  approval does **not** cover retiring D0b, which changes the approved
-  diagnostic sequence. **D1/D2 do not begin until revision 10 is
-  approved.** Also: NO IMPLEMENTATION and no fix
-  proposed** — the mechanism is not known yet, and the framing says so
+  APPROVED 2026-08-19 at `4fba9f6`** — revision 9 was approved at
+  `15c25ec`, but did **not** cover retiring D0b. Revision 10 does, with
+  the A3 contingency preserved: if the demonstrated D1/D2 mechanism
+  does not account for the subset/full difference, D0b runs before
+  closure. **D1/D2 are authorised but have not started.** Also: **NO
+  IMPLEMENTATION and no fix proposed** — the mechanism is not known yet,
+  and the framing says so
   rather than guessing. Revisions 1, 2 and 3 were each rejected on
   findings, all upheld; run provenance lives in
   `docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`.
diff --git a/docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md b/docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md
index bec5a31..49787c6 100644
--- a/docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md
+++ b/docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md
@@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
 # GPU launcher / probe SIGINT teardown — framing
 
-Revision 10. Status: **AWAITING APPROVAL. No fix implemented;
-mechanism still unknown.**
+Revision 10. Status: **APPROVED 2026-08-19 at `4fba9f6`. No fix
+implemented; mechanism still unknown.**
 
-Revision 9 was approved 2026-08-19 at `15c25ec`. **That approval does
-not extend to this revision**, because retiring D0b (§7) materially
-changes the approved diagnostic sequence — the approved text made D0b
-mandatory before every other diagnostic. D0a's execution and result
-(§4b) are reported under it, and D1/D2 do not begin until this revision
-is approved.
+Revision 9 was approved 2026-08-19 at `15c25ec`. **That approval did
+not extend to revision 10**, because retiring D0b (§7) materially
+changed the approved diagnostic sequence — the revision 9 text made
+D0b mandatory before every other diagnostic. Revision 10's approval
+covers that retirement and the A3 contingency that preserves its
+obligation. D0a's execution and result (§4b) are reported; D1/D2 are
+authorised but have not started.
 
 Revisions 1 and 2 were each rejected on five findings. Every correction
 is recorded in place rather than quietly rewritten, because three of