`run_conditions.index_run_ceiling` offered one value for a raise, and it
named a reason: `raised_because_index_sealing_unimplemented`. The emitter
never established that reason. It derives the declaration by comparing the
configured ceiling with the store default, and a comparison of two numbers
cannot know why they differ -- so the bundle asserted a cause on the
strength of a subtraction.
That was accurate while the unimplemented seal was the only reason to
raise the ceiling. Sealing landed, the raise was dropped, and the value
became a false explanation waiting for the next run that raises the
ceiling for any other purpose -- which the schema would have called valid.
`raised_above_store_default` is added and is what the emitter now writes.
It states the fact the comparison establishes and stops there.
The old spelling is retained and deprecated rather than removed.
`schema_version` is `const: 1`, so there is no later version to move
archived bundles to, and this repository has never held a bundle to check
against; the reference machine may hold ones that declare it. Invalidating
evidence already produced is worse than carrying a spelling nothing emits.
Deprecated does not mean unchecked, and that was the trap. The `allOf`
rule flooring a declared raise at 65 accepts either spelling, so a bundle
using the old one is still cross-checked against the recorded ceiling. Had
the rule kept keying on the new string alone, the deprecated value would
have skipped the cross-check entirely and been valid while recording 64.
`both_raised_spellings_are_accepted_and_bound_the_same_way` asserts, for
each spelling, that it validates and that it is refused when it records
the store default; narrowing the rule to the new value alone fails it.
The protocol crate's `submit_path_bundle` keeps the deprecated spelling
deliberately, as the standing proof that an archived bundle validates.
Recorded as contract review 2026-08-09-B. The scope doc's carry-forward
closed on the grounds that the enum was untouched -- true then, superseded
now -- so it carries an amendment rather than a rewrite, and its "truthful
values today" table now points at the corrections recorded elsewhere in
the same document.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01JGdH5V43XWnj1PdHqiPktQ
Levi Neuwirth
b10d5eee88