Levi Neuwirth
b4e4c7ebc7
B3 deliverables 6, 7 and 8. Each was an explicit NotImplemented stub whose recorded blocker had lapsed; together they take a sealed session from a pin nobody could hold to one recovery can resolve after the process that held it is gone. Finalize takes an adoption pin, and the state machine the deliverable described could not be built as written. The pin is taken from Sealed rather than Open, because the sealed manifest is what an adopter revalidates against. A definitive pre-append failure returns the session to Sealed rather than Open, because reconstruction reads that manifest's presence as the seal's own commit point and would hand back Sealed on the next restart regardless - returning a session to a state no restart can reproduce is the defect the private busy/state split exists to prevent. Adopted is durable and is a state the wording had no name for: adopted artifacts stay in staging/ with a committed root pointing into them, so dropping the session record would make the next reconstruction read the directory as an abandoned materialization and reclaim committed content. The pin is made durable before it is issued; a handle backed by an in-memory flag is an adoption capability with nothing behind it. Cleanup proves absence of reference, and absence is not enough on its own. A sealed session a client is still finalizing and a pinned one whose frame may be mid-append are both referenced by nothing, so the candidate set is the adopted sessions alone. The unit of removal is the session directory rather than the artifact: a manifest names every chunk and reconstruction refuses a sealed session missing any ordinal, so removing the unreferenced half of a directory trades a bounded leak for a root that fails to open. The supplied root must have reached the adoption - a root captured earlier references none of these artifacts because it predates them, and acting on that deletes a directory the current root points into. Recovery resolves a committed descriptor against the bytes on disk, not against staging's cached idea of them. Every declared ordinal is read back and its digest bound to the sealed record, the manifest's ordered list, and the frame's own artifact-set digest, so a valid replacement chunk of identical shape is refused rather than indexed. It resolves whole or not at all. A location names the whole certified record, so every object in a chunk shares that chunk's location and a reader validates the artifact before extracting from its decoded vector. Three frozen seams move, each recorded as a contract review: ProjectionAdoptionOutcome::Adopted and resolve_committed both gain the adoption's committed shard sequence, from whichever side made the frame authoritative; and checkpoint-style proof-bounded replacement earns a third caller for sys::rename_replace. Contract reviews 2026-07-31-A through -D. Scope 6.5 and plan 8 are amended where they specified behaviour that could not be built. Deliverables 6-8 are implemented and not yet operated: no production path calls begin, finalize, or adopt_projection, and expire still has no scheduler. Both carry-forwards stand. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XKzM69CHmBuDcA3qN1jFdh |
||
|---|---|---|
| .github/workflows | ||
| bench | ||
| crates | ||
| deploy | ||
| doc | ||
| scripts | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| Cargo.lock | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| README.md | ||
README.md
LeVCS
A distributed version control system with first-class federation, signed authority chains, and a cascading merge engine. Content-addressed by BLAKE3, signed with Ed25519, and built to fix what git can't.
Status: v0.1.0 — protocol substrate complete, workflow surface deferred. The object model, federation API, merge cascade, and instance server all work end-to-end. There is no PR review surface, issue tracker, or web UI yet — those are the next layer up. See
doc/technical-report.mdfor a full framing of where this project is and why.
What's different from git
- Identity is in the protocol. A repo's membership is a versioned, signed authority object with explicit roles (Reader/Contributor/Maintainer/Owner). Force-push enforcement and push authorization are protocol-level, not server policy.
- Federation is first-class. Every repo has a global
repo_id(BLAKE3 of its genesis authority); instances mirror each other in three storage modes (full / release-only / metadata-only). - Merge is a cascade, not a line-level diff. Per-file dispatch to a handler ranked by aggressiveness: textual fallback, format-aware (JSON / YAML / TOML / XML / Markdown / prose), tree-sitter for source code (Rust, Python, JS/TS, Go, C/C++, Java, Ruby, Bash), and wasm-sandboxed plugins for the long tail.
- BLAKE3, not SHA-1. Tree-hashed, ~5 GiB/s on a laptop, 32-byte IDs everywhere.
- Releases are signed objects, not mutable name pointers.
For a deeper comparison and context, see the technical report.
Building
LeVCS is a Rust workspace. You'll need a recent stable toolchain (workspace MSRV is 1.75) and a C compiler for the tree-sitter grammars.
cargo build --release
Two binaries land in target/release/:
levcs— the user-facing CLI.levcs-instance— the federation HTTP server.
Install them somewhere on PATH:
sudo install -m 0755 \
target/release/levcs target/release/levcs-instance \
/usr/local/bin/
Quick start (single user, local only)
# Generate an identity key (stored in $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/levcs/keys.toml).
levcs key generate --label me
# Create a repository wherever you have files to track.
mkdir /tmp/demo && cd /tmp/demo
echo "hello" > a.txt
levcs init --key me
levcs track --all
levcs commit -m "first commit"
levcs log
That's a fully working LeVCS repo. Branch and merge:
levcs branch feature/x
echo "more" >> a.txt
levcs commit -m "wip"
levcs branch main
levcs merge feature/x
If a merge produces conflicts, drop into the resolution TUI:
levcs merge --resolve
Cut a release:
levcs release v0.1.0 --notes "first release"
Hosting an instance
To dogfood the federation surface, run levcs-instance on a VPS behind
nginx or Caddy. The full walkthrough is in
deploy/README.md: build, systemd unit, reverse
proxy templates, firewall, and the laptop-side bootstrap.
The compressed version:
sudo cp deploy/levcs-instance.service /etc/systemd/system/
sudo cp deploy/instance.toml.example /etc/levcs/instance.toml
sudo $EDITOR /etc/levcs/instance.toml
sudo systemctl enable --now levcs-instance
# ... then drop deploy/Caddyfile.example into /etc/caddy/Caddyfile
From your laptop, point the local repo at the instance and push:
levcs instance --set https://levcs.example.com/levcs/v1
levcs push refs/branches/main
The first push to a fresh instance auto-inits the repo with your genesis authority. Subsequent pushes are role-checked against the authority chain.
Repository layout
crates/
levcs-core/ Object model (Blob/Tree/Commit/Release/Authority),
hash, store, refs, repository abstractions.
levcs-identity/ Authority objects, Ed25519 keys, signing/verify.
levcs-merge/ Cascade engine, format and tree-sitter handlers,
plugin runtime, merge records.
levcs-protocol/ Pack codec, wire types, request signing, P2P.
levcs-client/ Thin HTTP client over the federation API.
levcs-instance/ Axum HTTP server (the federation peer).
levcs-cli/ The `levcs` user-facing CLI.
levcs-tui/ Conflict-resolution terminal UI.
deploy/ Production deployment artifacts (systemd, Caddy, nginx).
scripts/ Reproducible benchmark and ops scripts.
doc/ Technical report and architecture docs.
.github/workflows/ CI configuration.
Testing
cargo test --workspace
Runs the full suite — unit tests, integration tests, federation end-to-end tests including the three-instance "dogfood" scenario, the merge conformance corpus, and property-based fuzz tests. ~194 tests at v0.1.0; full run is well under a minute on a modern laptop.
Useful subsets:
# A single crate's tests
cargo test -p levcs-merge
# A specific integration test
cargo test -p levcs-instance --test dogfood
# Property tests only
cargo test -p levcs-merge --test proptest_textual
Benchmarks
Microbenchmarks live in each crate's benches/ directory and use
criterion. A reproducible runner with metadata capture and optional
flamegraph generation is at scripts/bench.sh:
scripts/bench.sh --quick # smoke test (~ a minute total)
scripts/bench.sh # full criterion run (~ a few minutes)
scripts/bench.sh --flamegraph # generate per-bench SVG flamegraphs
scripts/bench.sh --bench pack_codec # one bench only
Output goes to bench-results/<host>-<UTC-timestamp>/ with a parsed
summary.txt, criterion's HTML reports, and a metadata.txt capturing
rustc version, kernel, CPU, and git rev for run-to-run comparison.
Headline numbers on a Ryzen 7 laptop:
- Pack decode at 10 × 1 MiB entries: ~2.3 ms (4.3 GiB/s).
- Blob serialize + BLAKE3 at 1 MiB: ~190 µs (5.1 GiB/s).
- Textual three-way merge of a 100 KiB document: ~4.6 ms.
Pack encoding is the throughput floor at ~380 MiB/s — bottlenecked by zstd level 3 on incompressible data.
Documentation
doc/technical-report.md— Distribution document. What LeVCS is, how to use it, and how it differs from / improves upon git. Targets technical evaluators and the workflow-spec reader.deploy/README.md— Comprehensive VPS deployment walkthrough.spec/— The protocol specification and trust-root revision. Currently kept private; ask the maintainer for a copy.
Contributing
This is a young project. The most useful contributions right now are:
- Trying it. Run
levcs initon a real project, push to a local instance, and report friction. - Workflow design. The next major piece of work is the workflow spec — PR/review surface, issues, CI conventions. Discussion welcome.
- Plugin handlers. The wasm plugin protocol exists; concrete handlers (e.g. protobuf, SQL migrations) are needed to validate it.
- Tightening CI. The
fmtandclippyGitHub jobs are informational; flipping them to gating would close a small but real quality gap.
Please open an issue or reach out before starting non-trivial work so we can coordinate.
License
Released under the Apache License 2.0 — see LICENSE for the
full text.
Citation
If LeVCS supports academic work, please cite the v0.1.0 release. A formal citation entry will land with the workflow spec; in the meantime a repository-URL reference is fine.