Go to file
Levi Neuwirth ca9fd3b7ce Separate a segment's identity from the manifest that publishes it
The prerequisite for checkpointing. `recovery_generation` was two numbers
wearing one name: the logical generation of the segment recovery seals, and
the generation of the manifest recovery installs. Every index run publishes a
manifest, so every seal moved the number — and the segment recovery then
wrote took the moved value while the frames inside it were already named by
the old one. Persisted index locations dangled.

Split, each answers its own question. The logical generation is the tail's,
derived from the manifest's committed prefix, so sealing a journal into a
segment changes where the bytes are and not what they are called. The
manifest generation is the next free one, so an index run's manifest and a
recovery's cannot collide. Collision detection moved with them: the old check
compared against a maximum mixing all three namespaces, which an index run
could raise on its own, and only a segment can collide with a segment.

This closes the coverage restriction the previous commit had to impose. A run
may again cover locations naming the active tail, because the tail's identity
now survives being sealed away — so sealing covers the frames of the session
that wrote them instead of lagging one behind. Mutation-checked by putting the
segment's identity back on the manifest counter, which reproduces the original
defect exactly: a recovered run pointing at a logical generation nothing pins.

One case is not closed, and a test found it rather than review. An orphan
`.seg` from an interrupted seal occupies a logical generation whether or not
it is a readable segment, and it may hold exactly the identity the tail wants.
`an_orphan_segment_leaves_the_active_journal_the_authority` is also the test
documenting why recovery must not refuse there — the active journal is still
the authority and an outage would be the wrong answer — so the seal falls back
to a free generation and renames the frames, as it did before. An index run
against the old identity then dangles. Confined to roots carrying an orphan
segment, where it was previously universal; the closure is for recovery to
discard runs whose identity was not preserved, recorded in scope §6.5.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01XKzM69CHmBuDcA3qN1jFdh
2026-07-30 15:20:13 -04:00
.github/workflows integrate CI and docs 2026-05-01 11:29:18 -04:00
bench Condition benchmark claims on the run that produced them 2026-07-29 17:38:03 -04:00
crates Separate a segment's identity from the manifest that publishes it 2026-07-30 15:20:13 -04:00
deploy levcs 0.1.0 - initial core 2026-05-01 11:14:36 -04:00
doc Separate a segment's identity from the manifest that publishes it 2026-07-30 15:20:13 -04:00
scripts Condition benchmark claims on the run that produced them 2026-07-29 17:38:03 -04:00
.gitignore levcs 0.1.0 - initial core 2026-05-01 11:14:36 -04:00
Cargo.lock Implement D0-B storage publication interfaces 2026-07-27 22:31:32 -04:00
Cargo.toml Implement D0-B storage publication interfaces 2026-07-27 22:31:32 -04:00
LICENSE integrate CI and docs 2026-05-01 11:29:18 -04:00
README.md integrate CI and docs 2026-05-01 11:29:18 -04:00

README.md

LeVCS

A distributed version control system with first-class federation, signed authority chains, and a cascading merge engine. Content-addressed by BLAKE3, signed with Ed25519, and built to fix what git can't.

Status: v0.1.0 — protocol substrate complete, workflow surface deferred. The object model, federation API, merge cascade, and instance server all work end-to-end. There is no PR review surface, issue tracker, or web UI yet — those are the next layer up. See doc/technical-report.md for a full framing of where this project is and why.


What's different from git

  • Identity is in the protocol. A repo's membership is a versioned, signed authority object with explicit roles (Reader/Contributor/Maintainer/Owner). Force-push enforcement and push authorization are protocol-level, not server policy.
  • Federation is first-class. Every repo has a global repo_id (BLAKE3 of its genesis authority); instances mirror each other in three storage modes (full / release-only / metadata-only).
  • Merge is a cascade, not a line-level diff. Per-file dispatch to a handler ranked by aggressiveness: textual fallback, format-aware (JSON / YAML / TOML / XML / Markdown / prose), tree-sitter for source code (Rust, Python, JS/TS, Go, C/C++, Java, Ruby, Bash), and wasm-sandboxed plugins for the long tail.
  • BLAKE3, not SHA-1. Tree-hashed, ~5 GiB/s on a laptop, 32-byte IDs everywhere.
  • Releases are signed objects, not mutable name pointers.

For a deeper comparison and context, see the technical report.


Building

LeVCS is a Rust workspace. You'll need a recent stable toolchain (workspace MSRV is 1.75) and a C compiler for the tree-sitter grammars.

cargo build --release

Two binaries land in target/release/:

  • levcs — the user-facing CLI.
  • levcs-instance — the federation HTTP server.

Install them somewhere on PATH:

sudo install -m 0755 \
    target/release/levcs target/release/levcs-instance \
    /usr/local/bin/

Quick start (single user, local only)

# Generate an identity key (stored in $XDG_CONFIG_HOME/levcs/keys.toml).
levcs key generate --label me

# Create a repository wherever you have files to track.
mkdir /tmp/demo && cd /tmp/demo
echo "hello" > a.txt

levcs init --key me
levcs track --all
levcs commit -m "first commit"
levcs log

That's a fully working LeVCS repo. Branch and merge:

levcs branch feature/x
echo "more" >> a.txt
levcs commit -m "wip"
levcs branch main
levcs merge feature/x

If a merge produces conflicts, drop into the resolution TUI:

levcs merge --resolve

Cut a release:

levcs release v0.1.0 --notes "first release"

Hosting an instance

To dogfood the federation surface, run levcs-instance on a VPS behind nginx or Caddy. The full walkthrough is in deploy/README.md: build, systemd unit, reverse proxy templates, firewall, and the laptop-side bootstrap.

The compressed version:

sudo cp deploy/levcs-instance.service /etc/systemd/system/
sudo cp deploy/instance.toml.example /etc/levcs/instance.toml
sudo $EDITOR /etc/levcs/instance.toml
sudo systemctl enable --now levcs-instance
# ... then drop deploy/Caddyfile.example into /etc/caddy/Caddyfile

From your laptop, point the local repo at the instance and push:

levcs instance --set https://levcs.example.com/levcs/v1
levcs push refs/branches/main

The first push to a fresh instance auto-inits the repo with your genesis authority. Subsequent pushes are role-checked against the authority chain.


Repository layout

crates/
  levcs-core/        Object model (Blob/Tree/Commit/Release/Authority),
                     hash, store, refs, repository abstractions.
  levcs-identity/    Authority objects, Ed25519 keys, signing/verify.
  levcs-merge/       Cascade engine, format and tree-sitter handlers,
                     plugin runtime, merge records.
  levcs-protocol/    Pack codec, wire types, request signing, P2P.
  levcs-client/      Thin HTTP client over the federation API.
  levcs-instance/    Axum HTTP server (the federation peer).
  levcs-cli/         The `levcs` user-facing CLI.
  levcs-tui/         Conflict-resolution terminal UI.

deploy/              Production deployment artifacts (systemd, Caddy, nginx).
scripts/             Reproducible benchmark and ops scripts.
doc/                 Technical report and architecture docs.
.github/workflows/   CI configuration.

Testing

cargo test --workspace

Runs the full suite — unit tests, integration tests, federation end-to-end tests including the three-instance "dogfood" scenario, the merge conformance corpus, and property-based fuzz tests. ~194 tests at v0.1.0; full run is well under a minute on a modern laptop.

Useful subsets:

# A single crate's tests
cargo test -p levcs-merge

# A specific integration test
cargo test -p levcs-instance --test dogfood

# Property tests only
cargo test -p levcs-merge --test proptest_textual

Benchmarks

Microbenchmarks live in each crate's benches/ directory and use criterion. A reproducible runner with metadata capture and optional flamegraph generation is at scripts/bench.sh:

scripts/bench.sh --quick               # smoke test (~ a minute total)
scripts/bench.sh                       # full criterion run (~ a few minutes)
scripts/bench.sh --flamegraph          # generate per-bench SVG flamegraphs
scripts/bench.sh --bench pack_codec    # one bench only

Output goes to bench-results/<host>-<UTC-timestamp>/ with a parsed summary.txt, criterion's HTML reports, and a metadata.txt capturing rustc version, kernel, CPU, and git rev for run-to-run comparison.

Headline numbers on a Ryzen 7 laptop:

  • Pack decode at 10 × 1 MiB entries: ~2.3 ms (4.3 GiB/s).
  • Blob serialize + BLAKE3 at 1 MiB: ~190 µs (5.1 GiB/s).
  • Textual three-way merge of a 100 KiB document: ~4.6 ms.

Pack encoding is the throughput floor at ~380 MiB/s — bottlenecked by zstd level 3 on incompressible data.


Documentation

  • doc/technical-report.md — Distribution document. What LeVCS is, how to use it, and how it differs from / improves upon git. Targets technical evaluators and the workflow-spec reader.
  • deploy/README.md — Comprehensive VPS deployment walkthrough.
  • spec/ — The protocol specification and trust-root revision. Currently kept private; ask the maintainer for a copy.

Contributing

This is a young project. The most useful contributions right now are:

  1. Trying it. Run levcs init on a real project, push to a local instance, and report friction.
  2. Workflow design. The next major piece of work is the workflow spec — PR/review surface, issues, CI conventions. Discussion welcome.
  3. Plugin handlers. The wasm plugin protocol exists; concrete handlers (e.g. protobuf, SQL migrations) are needed to validate it.
  4. Tightening CI. The fmt and clippy GitHub jobs are informational; flipping them to gating would close a small but real quality gap.

Please open an issue or reach out before starting non-trivial work so we can coordinate.


License

Released under the Apache License 2.0 — see LICENSE for the full text.


Citation

If LeVCS supports academic work, please cite the v0.1.0 release. A formal citation entry will land with the workflow spec; in the meantime a repository-URL reference is fine.