`cmn-24` was declared in the built-in pitch-space table as "CMN extended with
24-EDO quarter-tone accidentals" while Chapter 2 fixed a `Cmn` position's
absolute semitone at `nominal.chromatic() + alteration + 12*octave` for every
space, unqualified. Two ratified MUSTs, each correct in its own chapter,
jointly unsatisfiable -- P13-I1's two-listings drift in another costume.
The tracker parked this as "a data-model major". It is not.
`req:binfmt:frozen-layout` names `PitchSpacePosition` as one of four open
value-layer vocabularies, so three of the four available options cost no schema
event at all. The one that *is* a major -- regrading `alteration` onto a finer
fixed unit -- is also the only one that rewrites the canonical bytes of every
pitch ever authored, and it buys a single grid while `edo-31`/`53`/`72` stay
unrepresentable. It is explicitly ruled out.
Ratified instead: a `Cmn` alteration and a `CmnChromatic` modification are
denominated in steps of the enclosing pitch space's chromatic layer. One rule,
not a special case for one catalog row -- it settles `cmn-24`, `maqam-base`,
and `PitchSpaceModification::CmnChromatic` together. `cmn-12`'s step is the
semitone, so every score in existence keeps its meaning and **not one canonical
byte moves**; `canonical_pitch_bytes` writes the space id before the position,
so a `cmn-24` E-half-flat and a `cmn-12` E-flat already derive different
`PitchId`s.
The defect was larger than `cmn-24`. Nothing bound a `Cmn` position to a
12-chromatic space: `ScalePosition { space: "edo-31", position: Cmn { .. } }`
constructed, validated, encoded and transposed, and meant nothing. Neither
`Pitch::transposed` nor `twelve_tet_semitone` ever read the space. Until Push
4b resolves `PitchSpaceId` to a `DiatonicOverChromatic` structure, both now
fail closed outside provable built-in `cmn-12` -- a capability check, not a
claim that the identifier defines the structure. False refusal for a
score-defined 12-chromatic space is accepted over silently wrong arithmetic.
No wire change. `TransposeRefusal::PitchSpaceUnavailable` is a new *diagnostic*
mapping to the existing `PreconditionFailureReason::PitchSpaceMismatch` (6);
appending a discriminant for a guard Push 4b must delete would have reserved a
permanent wire value for a temporary mechanism, in exactly the artifact the
fail-closed ruling exists to protect. Assignments 10-15 are untouched.
Operation Catalog 0.9.0 records the broadened case *and* amends the 0.8.0
rationale, which asserted that discriminant 6 never consults a pitch-space
registry -- true of the non-`Cmn` check, false of this one.
Two spec-side fixes found in review, neither visible to any test: the
`TranspositionInterval` listing had lost its `pub chromatic_steps: i32,`
declaration to a comment rewrite, leaving a one-field struct above the sentence
"Both components are load-bearing"; and `pitch.rs` still documented
`alteration` as "in semitones", contradicting the requirement landing beside
it. Both new requirements are now cited from the code that implements them --
the label checker catches cited-but-undefined, not the reverse.
Push 4b keeps the registry work and loses the contradiction. P13-S4 is the last
item open in Batch 3.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
168 of core_spec's 207 requirement blocks carried no `\label`, so no conformance
claim could cite them. All 207 are labelled now; the suite is 277/277.
Labelling alone would not have delivered a citable requirement. **No document in
the suite numbered its requirements.** `\newtcolorbox{requirement}` had no
counter, so a `\label` inside one bound to the enclosing sectioning unit and
`\ref` rendered a *section* number: core_spec said "see Requirement 2.5.4" where
2.5.4 is a subsubsection, and 61 of its 207 requirements shared a rendered number
with another -- one number, 5.6.3, was shared by six. Adding 168 labels to that
scheme would have produced 168 citable-but-ambiguous references. All six documents
now carry a real counter, numbered within chapter, and the box title shows it, so
a reader can see which requirement they are looking at. 277 labels, zero
collisions.
The counter is stepped with a `code=` key rather than tcolorbox's own
`auto counter`, and that is not a style choice. `auto counter` steps its counter
for `\label` purposes inside an internal `\sbox`, and `\refstepcounter`'s effect
on `\@currentlabel` is a local assignment discarded when that box closes --
before a `\label` written in the box body ever runs, which is how every
requirement in this suite is labelled. Measured on a three-box test document:
titles rendered `1.1 1.2 1.3` while the three refs resolved to `1.1 1.1 1.2`. The
idiomatic form would have shipped 207 silently wrong cross-references under
correct-looking numbers.
`requirement_labels.rs` locks all of it: every requirement block in every
`spec/*.tex` carries a label; labels match `req:<area>:<slug>`; the area matches
the chapter; labels are unique suite-wide; no `req:*` string cited anywhere in the
repository is undefined; and the counter is stepped where the label can see it --
a regression lock, because reverting to `auto counter` leaves every other check
green while the references break.
The citation check needed an escape. It cannot tell "cite this requirement" from
"name a label that does not exist", and documenting a dangling label is a
legitimate thing to do -- it had already rewritten a scoping plan's prose into a
euphemism to make itself pass. `DISCUSSED_NOT_CITED` carries the one such string
with its reason.
That string was the pass's other finding. `req:layoutir:vertical-bands` was cited
twice in the Pass-12 log and never existed. It should not be repointed at the two
*ownership* requirements: those govern which band a primitive belongs to, while
both entries describe the inter-staff solve realizing a band's declared *height*,
which no requirement governs at all. That is why the log invented a name. Both
citations now say so, and the gap is filed as P13-S4 -- shipped behaviour with no
governing requirement.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Levi Neuwirth