epiphany/crates/epiphany-ops
Levi Neuwirth 0d8ec61a3c Pass 11 audit follow-up: honest LayoutObjectId status + doc/test gaps
Independent audit of b2f2e20 / a7adbdc. The canonical, document-state byte
layouts were already correct and golden-locked; this closes the one real
spec-vs-code gap (in the non-canonical layout namespace) and the smaller
doc/test gaps around it.

LayoutObjectId (item 2.6): the spec normatively stated the id "is derived ...
with MUSCLOID" and the ratification log / layout DECISIONS header called it
"pinned" -- but no code uses MUSCLOID (stable_layout_id and
manifestation_layout_id are untagged; synthesized_layout_id borrows MUSCCONF),
and MUSCLOID cannot even be constructed: DomainTag::from_bytes accepts only
built-ins or MUSCS-prefixed tags, so wiring it requires changing the frozen
determinism crate (out of scope for a spec pass, and the spec itself says
MUSCLOID is not a canonical system tag). Kept MUSCLOID as the pinned Track-A
target and made every artifact honest that the v0 code is provisional:
  - spec: "is derived" -> "MUST be derived" (forward contract) + a note that
    the prototype mints provisional ids; changelog "pinned" -> "specified ...
    as the Track-A target".
  - records: ratification-log line 2.6 and layout DECISIONS header/body now
    state spec-pinned-but-code-provisional; stale "Pass 11 candidate 3"
    pointer now cites the ratified requirement.
  - provenance.rs comments name the MUSCLOID target and label the current
    derivation provisional.

Other fixes:
  - epiphany-core/DECISIONS.md: the Tuplet bullet still claimed degenerate
    ratios are caught by runtime invariant 16 "since a Tuplet is a plain
    struct" -- stale after the construction-time TupletRatio change. Rewritten.
  - codec.rs: added degenerate_tuplet_ratio_is_rejected_on_decode, guarding
    the TupletRatio::dec re-validation branch that no test exercised (the
    constructor was tested, the decode path was not).
  - spec: integrity-anomaly snippet kind.canonical_bytes() ->
    to_canonical_bytes() (the actual method).
  - ids.rs / reduce.rs: clarifying comments (ManifestId's intentional,
    golden-locked document_id/generation duplication; compute_promotions
    bucketing by voice == (staff_instance, original_voice) via Invariant 5).

Verification: cargo test --workspace (434 pass, +1), clippy --all-targets clean
(0 warnings), fmt clean; spec rebuilds (lualatex, 0 undefined refs, 254pp).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-22 10:02:05 -04:00
..
examples A B C D F 2026-06-19 12:42:31 -04:00
src Pass 11 audit follow-up: honest LayoutObjectId status + doc/test gaps 2026-06-22 10:02:05 -04:00
tests Land M1 + M2 (Agent C): framework edge fixes and real-Score graph integration 2026-06-21 16:37:51 -04:00
Cargo.toml A B C D F 2026-06-19 12:42:31 -04:00
DECISIONS.md Pass 11: ratify provisional byte choices into normative spec text 2026-06-21 22:30:06 -04:00
README.md Land M1 + M2 (Agent C): framework edge fixes and real-Score graph integration 2026-06-21 16:37:51 -04:00

README.md

epiphany-ops

The Epiphany concurrent semantics: the operations through which the score graph becomes a live model, and the deterministic reduction by which a set of operations becomes a materialized score state. Implements the normative requirements of Chapter 6 (Semantic Operations and Concurrent Reduction) of the core specification (spec/core_spec.pdf). This is Agent C's crate per spec/QUICKSTART.md, building on Agent A's epiphany-determinism and Agent B's epiphany-core.

A score's state is defined by the set of operations committed to it. Any materialized graph is a deterministic reduction of that set; caches, snapshots, and partial reductions are acceleration structures, never the source of truth. — Chapter 6, Design Principles

The thesis in one paragraph

The replicated operation set is a grow-only CRDT: replicas accumulate envelopes and converge on the same set. The materialized graph is not a CRDT — it is the deterministic reduction of that set in a single canonical order (causal-first, then the HLC tuple). Any permutation of the same envelopes reduces to byte-identical materialized state. That property is the determinism heart of the architecture, and the reduction fuzzer is its tripwire.

What's here

Area Items Spec
Stamps HybridLogicalClock, OperationStamp, the reduction & monotonicity tuples Ch. 6 §"Operation Identity and Stamps"
Causal context CausalContext (dotted version vector), covers, the missing-predecessor signal Ch. 6 §6.2
Payloads OperationKind, the discriminator-only OperationKindTag, OperationPayload, the §6.10 representative ops Ch. 6 §"Operation Envelopes", §6.10
Envelopes OperationEnvelope, EnvelopeHash (MUSCENVH), well_formed (incl. stamp.id == id) Ch. 6 §6.4
Slots OperationSlot::{Single, Equivocated}, the order-independent (Pass-10) transitions Ch. 6 §6.5
Anomalies AnomalousReplicaSegment, IntegrityAnomaly/Kind, the HLC-monotonicity detector Ch. 6 §6.6; Ch. 5 §"System-Derived Counter Collisions"
Effects OperationEffect, NoOpReason, the typed PreconditionFailureReason, RepairRecord/RepairKind Ch. 6 §6.3.2, §6.5
Conflicts ConflictRecord, ConflictKind, content-derived ConflictId (derive_conflict_id), the registry, resolution Ch. 6 §6.4
Transactions / undo TransactionDescriptor with the causal-prior-descriptor rule, UndoTransactionPayload / UndoPolicy Ch. 6 §6.6, §6.8
Operation set OperationSet: accept pipeline (well-formedness → slot → causal), grow-only Ch. 6 §"Envelope Acceptance"
Reduction canonical_reduction_order (single function), MaterializedState, the reduction driver Ch. 6 §6.3

The determinism this crate enforces

  1. A single reduction-order function. canonical_reduction_order performs deterministic causal topological ordering, using the intrinsic stamp tuple (physical, logical, replica, counter) only among ready operations.
  2. Order-independent equivocation. A duplicate OperationId with different canonical bytes transitions its slot to Equivocated regardless of which envelope arrived first (Pass 10). Equivocated slots contribute nothing to reduction; dependents are held pending.
  3. Content-derived facts. ConflictId and IntegrityAnomalyId are derived from content, so two replicas reducing the same set agree on every conflict and anomaly id — the conflict registry and anomaly register are deterministic materialized facts, not local bookkeeping.
  4. Byte-identical materialized state. MaterializedState::canonical_bytes serializes the effect log, conflict registry, anomaly register, object existence, spellings, and LWW fields in their normative orders.
  5. Real graph materialization. OperationSet::reduce_onto(&base_score) returns GraphMaterialization { state, score }. The graph is mutated in the same canonical order and compares by canonical event identity, independent of arena storage order.

Hand-off gates

Run the gate harnesses (QUICKSTART, Agent C):

cargo test -p epiphany-ops
cargo run --release -p epiphany-ops --example fuzz_reduction          # 10k iters, seed 0
cargo run --release -p epiphany-ops --example fuzz_reduction 100000 7 # soak, seed 7
  • Reduction determinism — every randomized envelope set reduces to byte-identical materialized state under any acceptance order (v0 acceptance criteria 1 and 5).
  • Equivocation order-independence — every duplicate-id-with-different-bytes scenario equivocates regardless of arrival order (v0 acceptance criterion 3).

The integration tests (tests/concurrent_reduction.rs) exercise these plus transaction atomicity, descriptor precedence, anomaly exclusion, and forward undo through the public API.

Scope and decisions

Chapter 6 specifies the framework and a representative selection of operations; the full ~6080-primitive catalog is an explicit open question (§6.11) deferred to the Operation Catalog companion. This crate implements the framework in full and the representative operations, which is sufficient to exercise every reduction discipline. The representative operations can also reduce onto an epiphany_core::Score: insert/delete, voice promotion, supported cross-cutting structures, system breaks, migration checks, transaction rollback, and undo mutate the real graph while preserving Agent B's invariants. reduce() remains the base-free CRDT/bookkeeping API; reduce_onto() is the graph-aware editing path. See DECISIONS.md for remaining payload boundaries.

Per QUICKSTART "Don't do these": undo is the spec's forward compensating operation, never inverse-based; unsafe is forbidden; everything is sync.