The Engraver now evaluates the IR's declared hard constraints against the
resolved geometry and reports honestly, so it reports SolverTier::Minimal --
"hard constraints satisfied, no claim about optimality" (Chapter 9) -- instead
of the interface-only Stub.
- evaluate_constraints checks each LayoutConstraint against the resolved glyph
boxes: NoCollision (boxes do not overlap), Align (equal baseline y for the
Horizontal axis, equal x for Vertical), PositionWithin (box inside the
region). A hard SystemBreakAt/PageBreakAt is reported unsatisfied -- a
single-system, single-page Minimal solve casts off nothing (a soft break
imposes no obligation); an unverifiable Registered extension constraint is
conservatively not claimed satisfied.
- Honest report status: a malformed input (invalid structure or forged/unknown
catalog) is InternalError; a valid problem whose hard constraints cannot all
be satisfied is Unsatisfiable, naming the offenders in unsatisfied_constraints;
all satisfied is Solved. satisfied_hard_constraints and
budget_used.constraint_evaluations reflect real work (0 when evaluation is
skipped on a malformed input).
- Minimal makes no normalized-metric claim, so the metric vector stays the
conservative all-worst "no claim" placeholder (the Quality Metric Catalog is
Phase 3 / Standard). Still deferred to a later tier: the vertical spring pass
(glyph y is the constrained natural staff layout, preserved verbatim) and
casting-off.
Tests pin the tier, an empty (vacuously satisfied) constraint set, satisfied vs
violated NoCollision, hard-vs-soft breaks, and the skipped-evaluation count.
Full gate green: build, fmt, clippy, 578 tests, conformance scale 1.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Levi Neuwirth
1c147534bf