My design note was half right, and the audit caught the other half. Keeping
engraved_spelling_chain physically separate from respell_chain was correct --
respell_chain is RespellPitch's LWW working state, read by its
concurrent-differing conflict detection, and folding transposes into it would
make a concurrent respell conflict with a transpose and move the canonical
bytes of every existing history. What that did NOT license was letting one
operation own the key.
RespellPitch mutates the same graph attachments and recorded nowhere on the
attachment chain, so a chain with a single writer was wrong both ways. Both
reproduced:
respell -> [tx: transpose] -> StrictInverse undo
Applied; pitch restored to C4; the UserChosen(C) attachment ERASED.
The respell was an operation, not part of the base, so the transpose's
chain had never seen it and its predecessor was absence.
[tx: transpose] -> respell -> StrictInverse undo
Applied; the newer UserChosen(D) authoring WIPED. The respell was
invisible to the chain, so it never registered as a superseding writer,
contradicting the catalog's rule that a later canonical writer supersedes
a strict undo.
And BestEffort could restore the pre-transpose pitch while leaving a spelling
authored against the transposed one attached to it.
Fix: every writer of the attachments records on the attachment chain
(record_engraved_spellings), and a pitch's value and its engraved spelling set
undo as one unit -- if either half is superseded, neither is restored.
StrictInverse already refuses on any supersession, so the coupling only bites
for BestEffort. Two physical chains, two responsibilities: respell_chain owns
the ledger spelling and the LWW verdict, engraved_spelling_chain owns the graph
attachments.
Recording is gated on graph presence, so base-free reduction is byte-unchanged
and the seeded corpus's canonical-base digest does not move.
Four tests, two mutations verified: removing the respell's record fails all
three undo tests; removing the coupling fails the best-effort one with the
pitch back at C4 and its spelling still at C-sharp. The fourth test locks
convergence -- both permutations of a concurrent respell/transpose reduce to
identical canonical bytes.
Spec: new req:opcat:spelling-set-chain. Batch 3 of the Pass-13 ledger reopens
(P13-S1, S2 open; S3 resolved here).
Also: PitchSpelling::transposed's doc said B-sharp 3 becomes F-double-sharp 3.
The code, spec, and tests all correctly produce F-double-sharp 4 -- B to F
carries the octave. Doc only.
Gate: fmt clean, clippy 0, 30 targets / 998 passed / 0 failed, docs 0 under
-D warnings, conformance 8/8, zero golden churn, canonical-base digest unmoved.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| examples | ||
| src | ||
| tests | ||
| Cargo.toml | ||
| DECISIONS.md | ||
| README.md | ||
README.md
epiphany-ops
The Epiphany concurrent semantics: the operations through which the score
graph becomes a live model, and the deterministic reduction by which a set of
operations becomes a materialized score state. Implements the normative
requirements of Chapter 6 (Semantic Operations and Concurrent Reduction) of
the core specification (spec/core_spec.pdf). This is Agent C's crate per
spec/QUICKSTART.md, building on Agent A's epiphany-determinism and Agent B's
epiphany-core.
A score's state is defined by the set of operations committed to it. Any materialized graph is a deterministic reduction of that set; caches, snapshots, and partial reductions are acceleration structures, never the source of truth. — Chapter 6, Design Principles
The thesis in one paragraph
The replicated operation set is a grow-only CRDT: replicas accumulate envelopes and converge on the same set. The materialized graph is not a CRDT — it is the deterministic reduction of that set in a single canonical order (causal-first, then the HLC tuple). Any permutation of the same envelopes reduces to byte-identical materialized state. That property is the determinism heart of the architecture, and the reduction fuzzer is its tripwire.
What's here
| Area | Items | Spec |
|---|---|---|
| Stamps | HybridLogicalClock, OperationStamp, the reduction & monotonicity tuples |
Ch. 6 §"Operation Identity and Stamps" |
| Causal context | CausalContext (dotted version vector), covers, the missing-predecessor signal |
Ch. 6 §6.2 |
| Payloads | OperationKind, the discriminator-only OperationKindTag, OperationPayload, the §6.10 representative ops |
Ch. 6 §"Operation Envelopes", §6.10 |
| Envelopes | OperationEnvelope, EnvelopeHash (MUSCENVH), well_formed (incl. stamp.id == id) |
Ch. 6 §6.4 |
| Slots | OperationSlot::{Single, Equivocated}, the order-independent (Pass-10) transitions |
Ch. 6 §6.5 |
| Anomalies | AnomalousReplicaSegment, IntegrityAnomaly/Kind, the HLC-monotonicity detector |
Ch. 6 §6.6; Ch. 5 §"System-Derived Counter Collisions" |
| Effects | OperationEffect, NoOpReason, the typed PreconditionFailureReason, RepairRecord/RepairKind |
Ch. 6 §6.3.2, §6.5 |
| Conflicts | ConflictRecord, ConflictKind, content-derived ConflictId (derive_conflict_id), the registry, resolution |
Ch. 6 §6.4 |
| Transactions / undo | TransactionDescriptor with the causal-prior-descriptor rule, UndoTransactionPayload / UndoPolicy |
Ch. 6 §6.6, §6.8 |
| Operation set | OperationSet: accept pipeline (well-formedness → slot → causal), grow-only |
Ch. 6 §"Envelope Acceptance" |
| Reduction | canonical_reduction_order (single function), MaterializedState, the reduction driver |
Ch. 6 §6.3 |
The determinism this crate enforces
- A single reduction-order function.
canonical_reduction_orderperforms deterministic causal topological ordering, using the intrinsic stamp tuple(physical, logical, replica, counter)only among ready operations. - Order-independent equivocation. A duplicate
OperationIdwith different canonical bytes transitions its slot toEquivocatedregardless of which envelope arrived first (Pass 10). Equivocated slots contribute nothing to reduction; dependents are held pending. - Content-derived facts.
ConflictIdandIntegrityAnomalyIdare derived from content, so two replicas reducing the same set agree on every conflict and anomaly id — the conflict registry and anomaly register are deterministic materialized facts, not local bookkeeping. - Byte-identical materialized state.
MaterializedState::canonical_bytesserializes the effect log, conflict registry, anomaly register, object existence, spellings, and LWW fields in their normative orders. - Real graph materialization.
OperationSet::reduce_onto(&base_score)returnsGraphMaterialization { state, score }. The graph is mutated in the same canonical order and compares by canonical event identity, independent of arena storage order.
Hand-off gates
Run the gate harnesses (QUICKSTART, Agent C):
cargo test -p epiphany-ops
cargo run --release -p epiphany-ops --example fuzz_reduction # 10k iters, seed 0
cargo run --release -p epiphany-ops --example fuzz_reduction 100000 7 # soak, seed 7
- Reduction determinism — every randomized envelope set reduces to byte-identical materialized state under any acceptance order (v0 acceptance criteria 1 and 5).
- Equivocation order-independence — every duplicate-id-with-different-bytes scenario equivocates regardless of arrival order (v0 acceptance criterion 3).
The integration tests (tests/concurrent_reduction.rs) exercise these plus
transaction atomicity, descriptor precedence, anomaly exclusion, and forward
undo through the public API.
Scope and decisions
Chapter 6 specifies the framework and a representative selection of
operations; the full ~60–80-primitive catalog is an explicit open question
(§6.11) deferred to the Operation Catalog companion. This crate implements the
framework in full and the representative operations, which is sufficient to
exercise every reduction discipline. The representative operations can also
reduce onto an epiphany_core::Score: insert/delete, voice promotion, supported
cross-cutting structures, system breaks, migration checks, transaction
rollback, and undo mutate the real graph while preserving Agent B's invariants.
reduce() remains the base-free CRDT/bookkeeping API; reduce_onto() is the
graph-aware editing path. See DECISIONS.md for remaining payload boundaries.
Per QUICKSTART "Don't do these": undo is the spec's forward compensating
operation, never inverse-based; unsafe is forbidden; everything is sync.