epiphany/crates/epiphany-ops
Levi Neuwirth 430214d619 Pass 13 — P13-D2: tombstone before the graph delete, closing the cue-cascade trail
delete_event tombstoned the event in objects AFTER materialize_graph_delete —
but that graph pass cascades a cue among the event's referents, running
reanchor_for_tombstone over the cue's referents while the source event is still
Live. A slur bridging {X, cue-of-X} therefore re-anchored onto X
(Reanchored{to: X}) and then cascade-deleted when X's tombstone landed a line
later: a contradictory same-effect trail (candidate was "plausible by code
trace, unexecuted" — now executed; reverting the fix reproduces exactly that
two-record trail).

Fix: tombstone the event in objects BEFORE the graph delete, matching the
conventions cascade_cue and tombstone_undo_targets already follow (both
tombstone before their graph delete — which is why the undo path never had this
bug). The bridging slur now sees X already dead during the cue cascade and
cascades once.

Regression: deleting_a_cue_source_does_not_leave_a_contradictory_repair_for_a_
bridging_slur_p13_d2 (built on a cue-bearing base with a bridging slur; asserts
exactly one CascadeDeleted, no Reanchored). Verified to fail without the fix.
940 tests, convergence/conformance green.

PASS13_CANDIDATES.md: P13-D2 resolved — batch CLOSED (all four candidates done).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-08 18:25:37 -04:00
..
examples A B C D F 2026-06-19 12:42:31 -04:00
src Pass 13 — P13-D2: tombstone before the graph delete, closing the cue-cascade trail 2026-07-08 18:25:37 -04:00
tests Schema major 2 Phase B: snapshot side + honest stamps (data-model fills) 2026-07-07 16:30:07 -04:00
Cargo.toml A B C D F 2026-06-19 12:42:31 -04:00
DECISIONS.md Pass 13 — P13-D2: tombstone before the graph delete, closing the cue-cascade trail 2026-07-08 18:25:37 -04:00
README.md Land M1 + M2 (Agent C): framework edge fixes and real-Score graph integration 2026-06-21 16:37:51 -04:00

README.md

epiphany-ops

The Epiphany concurrent semantics: the operations through which the score graph becomes a live model, and the deterministic reduction by which a set of operations becomes a materialized score state. Implements the normative requirements of Chapter 6 (Semantic Operations and Concurrent Reduction) of the core specification (spec/core_spec.pdf). This is Agent C's crate per spec/QUICKSTART.md, building on Agent A's epiphany-determinism and Agent B's epiphany-core.

A score's state is defined by the set of operations committed to it. Any materialized graph is a deterministic reduction of that set; caches, snapshots, and partial reductions are acceleration structures, never the source of truth. — Chapter 6, Design Principles

The thesis in one paragraph

The replicated operation set is a grow-only CRDT: replicas accumulate envelopes and converge on the same set. The materialized graph is not a CRDT — it is the deterministic reduction of that set in a single canonical order (causal-first, then the HLC tuple). Any permutation of the same envelopes reduces to byte-identical materialized state. That property is the determinism heart of the architecture, and the reduction fuzzer is its tripwire.

What's here

Area Items Spec
Stamps HybridLogicalClock, OperationStamp, the reduction & monotonicity tuples Ch. 6 §"Operation Identity and Stamps"
Causal context CausalContext (dotted version vector), covers, the missing-predecessor signal Ch. 6 §6.2
Payloads OperationKind, the discriminator-only OperationKindTag, OperationPayload, the §6.10 representative ops Ch. 6 §"Operation Envelopes", §6.10
Envelopes OperationEnvelope, EnvelopeHash (MUSCENVH), well_formed (incl. stamp.id == id) Ch. 6 §6.4
Slots OperationSlot::{Single, Equivocated}, the order-independent (Pass-10) transitions Ch. 6 §6.5
Anomalies AnomalousReplicaSegment, IntegrityAnomaly/Kind, the HLC-monotonicity detector Ch. 6 §6.6; Ch. 5 §"System-Derived Counter Collisions"
Effects OperationEffect, NoOpReason, the typed PreconditionFailureReason, RepairRecord/RepairKind Ch. 6 §6.3.2, §6.5
Conflicts ConflictRecord, ConflictKind, content-derived ConflictId (derive_conflict_id), the registry, resolution Ch. 6 §6.4
Transactions / undo TransactionDescriptor with the causal-prior-descriptor rule, UndoTransactionPayload / UndoPolicy Ch. 6 §6.6, §6.8
Operation set OperationSet: accept pipeline (well-formedness → slot → causal), grow-only Ch. 6 §"Envelope Acceptance"
Reduction canonical_reduction_order (single function), MaterializedState, the reduction driver Ch. 6 §6.3

The determinism this crate enforces

  1. A single reduction-order function. canonical_reduction_order performs deterministic causal topological ordering, using the intrinsic stamp tuple (physical, logical, replica, counter) only among ready operations.
  2. Order-independent equivocation. A duplicate OperationId with different canonical bytes transitions its slot to Equivocated regardless of which envelope arrived first (Pass 10). Equivocated slots contribute nothing to reduction; dependents are held pending.
  3. Content-derived facts. ConflictId and IntegrityAnomalyId are derived from content, so two replicas reducing the same set agree on every conflict and anomaly id — the conflict registry and anomaly register are deterministic materialized facts, not local bookkeeping.
  4. Byte-identical materialized state. MaterializedState::canonical_bytes serializes the effect log, conflict registry, anomaly register, object existence, spellings, and LWW fields in their normative orders.
  5. Real graph materialization. OperationSet::reduce_onto(&base_score) returns GraphMaterialization { state, score }. The graph is mutated in the same canonical order and compares by canonical event identity, independent of arena storage order.

Hand-off gates

Run the gate harnesses (QUICKSTART, Agent C):

cargo test -p epiphany-ops
cargo run --release -p epiphany-ops --example fuzz_reduction          # 10k iters, seed 0
cargo run --release -p epiphany-ops --example fuzz_reduction 100000 7 # soak, seed 7
  • Reduction determinism — every randomized envelope set reduces to byte-identical materialized state under any acceptance order (v0 acceptance criteria 1 and 5).
  • Equivocation order-independence — every duplicate-id-with-different-bytes scenario equivocates regardless of arrival order (v0 acceptance criterion 3).

The integration tests (tests/concurrent_reduction.rs) exercise these plus transaction atomicity, descriptor precedence, anomaly exclusion, and forward undo through the public API.

Scope and decisions

Chapter 6 specifies the framework and a representative selection of operations; the full ~6080-primitive catalog is an explicit open question (§6.11) deferred to the Operation Catalog companion. This crate implements the framework in full and the representative operations, which is sufficient to exercise every reduction discipline. The representative operations can also reduce onto an epiphany_core::Score: insert/delete, voice promotion, supported cross-cutting structures, system breaks, migration checks, transaction rollback, and undo mutate the real graph while preserving Agent B's invariants. reduce() remains the base-free CRDT/bookkeeping API; reduce_onto() is the graph-aware editing path. See DECISIONS.md for remaining payload boundaries.

Per QUICKSTART "Don't do these": undo is the spec's forward compensating operation, never inverse-based; unsafe is forbidden; everything is sync.