43 lines
2.0 KiB
TOML
43 lines
2.0 KiB
TOML
[package]
|
|
name = "probe-iced"
|
|
version = "0.1.0"
|
|
edition.workspace = true
|
|
publish.workspace = true
|
|
|
|
# Round 0 desk survey + accessibility-route probe for candidate C3 (iced).
|
|
# See CONTRACT_EDITOR_T4_SPIKE.md Round 0, and the candidate set's own
|
|
# framing of C3: "AccessKit lists egui among integrated projects and does
|
|
# not list iced, and iced's upstream accessibility issue (#552) remains
|
|
# open. A manual accesskit_winit route may exist; round 0 demonstrates it
|
|
# or C3 fails there."
|
|
#
|
|
# ROUND-0 RESULT: FAIL. C3 is eliminated at round 0 (adjudicated 2026-07-28,
|
|
# no waiver). This crate is retained only as the evidence.
|
|
#
|
|
# Candidate limitation — the fact that fails the round: iced 0.14 ships no
|
|
# accessibility integration at all (`accesskit` appears in no iced crate
|
|
# manifest), and its STOCK RUNNER exposes to application code neither a
|
|
# `winit::event_loop::ActiveEventLoop` nor a pre-visibility
|
|
# `winit::window::Window`; both appear only inside `iced_winit`'s own private
|
|
# `ApplicationHandler` impl, with `create_window` at `iced_winit-0.14.0/
|
|
# src/lib.rs:350` inside iced's runner. Every `accesskit_winit::Adapter`
|
|
# constructor requires them, and panics if the window is already visible.
|
|
# Scoped deliberately to the stock runner: `iced_winit`'s docs offer a
|
|
# `conversion` module "for users that decide to implement a custom event
|
|
# loop", so a hand-built shell is CONCEIVABLE BUT UNPROVEN — and would mean
|
|
# owning the shell. Upstream iced #552 remains open.
|
|
#
|
|
# Probe-design defect — why the first report read PASS: `accesskit_unix::
|
|
# Adapter::new()` takes no window handle, so this probe registered a
|
|
# hand-built static tree at process level, decoupled from iced's window,
|
|
# focus, and event lifecycle, with actions discarded. It reads back cleanly
|
|
# and proves nothing about iced: DELETING ICED FROM THIS PROBE WOULD PRODUCE
|
|
# THE IDENTICAL READBACK. `accesskit_unix` being the layer beneath
|
|
# `accesskit_winit` does not make it a route *for the candidate* — that was
|
|
# the reasoning error.
|
|
|
|
[dependencies]
|
|
iced = "0.14"
|
|
accesskit = "0.24"
|
|
accesskit_unix = "0.22"
|