Scoping the operation layer surfaced a contradiction the companion had never
resolved. `req:textproj:value-projection` is a mechanical rule over structs,
enums and newtypes; the Grammar chapter separately spells out `envelope`,
`stamp`, `causal`, `payload`, `kind` and their sub-vocabularies. The two disagree.
Under the value rule an operation would read
`(insert-event (insert-event-op #x0a <event>))`, because an `*Op` record is a
named-field struct and so not a transparent newtype.
`req:textproj:operation-vocabulary` rules for the grammar, which is what the
companion already implied: the value rule's own preamble scopes itself to the
values an operation *embeds*, and the `value` nonterminal marks where it applies.
If the rule governed the vocabulary too, the grammar's productions would be
redundant and partly wrong.
An operation kind therefore inlines its payload record, and the requirement says
why rather than asserting it: the record exists so each variant can name a type,
and the binary form adds no bytes for it -- `OperationKind`'s encoding writes the
tag and delegates. A wrapper that adds no bytes adds no text. That is the same
argument clause 2 makes for newtype transparency, applied one level out.
Also removes a second name for one type. `transpose-interval` inlined its interval
as `(interval <d> <c>)` while `TranspositionInterval` projects as
`(transposition-interval <d> <c>)` at every `value` position. The production now
delegates to `value` and the special case is gone.
Two new checker tests lock both, bringing that gate to nine.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Levi Neuwirth
4ded63a583