S5 and S6 close, which closes the spec half of Push 4b: the JI basis is
full-register (a JiVector is an absolute position -- without the prime-2
exponent, ji-5limit cannot tell C4 from C5), and all twenty tuning systems now
carry constructions rather than names.
S7 is filed retroactively. Its id was minted in PLAN_PUSH4B_TUNING.md marked
"new; file it", ratified as that plan's Ruling C, and implemented in Wave 1a --
but it never entered this ledger, so an id lived outside the index whose whole
job is to be the index. The candidate itself: the specification required every
score to *define* a pitch space, and the data model gives a score no way to do
it. Both "define"s are now "select".
S8 is new and was measured, not argued. TempoShape::Constant legalizes
end_tempo as None *or* equal to start_tempo -- two spellings of one musical
fact -- and TempoSegment encodes the field positionally into canonical state.
Encoding both forms of an otherwise identical score gives 336 bytes and 363.
Nothing normalizes; invariants.rs merely permits both. Everywhere else this
project looked at redundant encodings it ruled the other way: NFC for text, a
total order for collections. Tempo got no equivalent, so two musically
identical scores hash differently. Found sideways -- the branch is untested,
which is why the map_or rewrite could not be mutation-verified there.
S9 is the pattern behind three failures in one day: the citation checker
proves cited-to-defined and never cited-to-relevant, so a citation that
resolves cleanly while supporting nothing passes a fully green gate. An agent
justified "resolved layout is non-canonical" with a requirement about f32; a
dispatch contract of mine put KeySignature in Chapter 10 when the Score Graph
is Chapter 5. And S4 is itself an instance, which is what turned this from
incident into candidate.
The asymmetry is the dangerous part and is recorded with it: a dangling
citation is loud, a wrong one is silent, so repairing the loud kind without
reading the target converts a caught defect into an uncaught one. That is
exactly how S4 happened.
Every line citation in the new entries was re-read against its target before
filing, S9's own discipline applied to S9.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Levi Neuwirth
600cc31be4