Registered joins the semantic-lock inventory. Its corpus row is emitted under the
variant name at ops/src/vectors.rs:210 and its committed literal leads with 0x10
at spec/vectors/decode_vectors.txt:80, so the drift comparison binds the
association. The uncovered set narrows to 0, 2-15, 17-23, and 30-33.
Verifying that turned up a false clause of my own. The entry said the corpus's
tag coverage is unchosen and unmaintained. It is neither: vectors.rs:201-204
emits one row per tag straight from the vocabulary and states the reason -- a
hand-picked subset is how TransposeInterval shipped encoding to a byte its own
decoder rejected.
But the rows lock byte-to-byte, not variant-to-byte. Each is named
tag_{discriminant} and carries [discriminant], both derived from the value alone,
so tag_32 asserts that 0x20 round-trips and never that SetCanvasLayoutDefaults is
32. All forty rows are identical under a permutation; what moves is their order,
since PAYLOAD_FREE is declaration order. That is why the 32<->33 probe failed,
established from the committed file's ascending tag_NN rows rather than inferred.
Which sharpens the entry rather than weakening it: Registered's row has exactly
the property the numbered rows lack, because it is named for its variant. The gap
is that one row's discipline is not the vocabulary's.
Ledger-only. No code, wire, or specification change.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QjsEnYhm1gPpf6ii2iFxFV
Levi Neuwirth
6f790bca65