epiphany/crates/epiphany-ops
Levi Neuwirth a28d888c8e epiphany-editor-core: a headless editor API + a conformance UI-seam gate
Packages the proven editing-loop vertical slice as the API a GUI calls -- no UI,
no rendering backend of its own (it produces a RenderIR). EditorSession owns:

  - selection state (Selection { source, layout_object }): click(point) selects the
    topmost hit, select(id) restores a selection, selection()/clear_selection();
  - render/hit-test query: render() and hit_test() for the GUI to draw and resolve
    clicks/drags;
  - operation minting -- the ergonomics gap the harness exposed, closed before UI
    depends on it: the caller passes an OperationKind to apply() (or an intent like
    transpose_selection(+1)) and the session assembles the OperationEnvelope (id,
    author, stamp, causal context). A GUI never hand-rolls envelope bookkeeping;
  - apply/re-render -- ATOMIC: a minted op the reducer rejects (e.g. a reserved
    replica identity) returns Err(RejectedOperation), not a silent no-op, and a
    diagnostic-only layout returns Err(NotRenderable); on any error nothing mutates,
    operation counter included (the candidate id is committed only on success);
  - selection preservation: the selection is re-resolved against the new layout,
    kept when its layout object survives and cleared when it is gone.

The session is solver-agnostic (Box<dyn ConstraintSolver>), so a GUI plugs in the
Engraver, the stub, or any conformant solver. EditorError implements Display/Error.
epiphany-ops now re-exports AcceptOutcome (accept()'s return type, previously
unreachable) so a caller can inspect a rejection.

Also wires the edit-loop harness into the conformance suite as the [7c] UI-seam
gate: over both fixtures (ten_measure_single_staff and valid_score_rich) every seed
must drive a click->sharpen->re-render cycle whose selection survives the relayout
-- the contract a GUI's correctness rests on.

Full gate green: build, fmt, clippy, 606 tests, conformance scale 1 (incl. [7c]).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-27 16:47:34 -04:00
..
examples A B C D F 2026-06-19 12:42:31 -04:00
src epiphany-editor-core: a headless editor API + a conformance UI-seam gate 2026-06-27 16:47:34 -04:00
tests Agent K M2e review follow-up: tighten catalog accuracy + container creates 2026-06-26 09:52:13 -04:00
Cargo.toml A B C D F 2026-06-19 12:42:31 -04:00
DECISIONS.md Agent K M2e review follow-up: tighten catalog accuracy + container creates 2026-06-26 09:52:13 -04:00
README.md Land M1 + M2 (Agent C): framework edge fixes and real-Score graph integration 2026-06-21 16:37:51 -04:00

README.md

epiphany-ops

The Epiphany concurrent semantics: the operations through which the score graph becomes a live model, and the deterministic reduction by which a set of operations becomes a materialized score state. Implements the normative requirements of Chapter 6 (Semantic Operations and Concurrent Reduction) of the core specification (spec/core_spec.pdf). This is Agent C's crate per spec/QUICKSTART.md, building on Agent A's epiphany-determinism and Agent B's epiphany-core.

A score's state is defined by the set of operations committed to it. Any materialized graph is a deterministic reduction of that set; caches, snapshots, and partial reductions are acceleration structures, never the source of truth. — Chapter 6, Design Principles

The thesis in one paragraph

The replicated operation set is a grow-only CRDT: replicas accumulate envelopes and converge on the same set. The materialized graph is not a CRDT — it is the deterministic reduction of that set in a single canonical order (causal-first, then the HLC tuple). Any permutation of the same envelopes reduces to byte-identical materialized state. That property is the determinism heart of the architecture, and the reduction fuzzer is its tripwire.

What's here

Area Items Spec
Stamps HybridLogicalClock, OperationStamp, the reduction & monotonicity tuples Ch. 6 §"Operation Identity and Stamps"
Causal context CausalContext (dotted version vector), covers, the missing-predecessor signal Ch. 6 §6.2
Payloads OperationKind, the discriminator-only OperationKindTag, OperationPayload, the §6.10 representative ops Ch. 6 §"Operation Envelopes", §6.10
Envelopes OperationEnvelope, EnvelopeHash (MUSCENVH), well_formed (incl. stamp.id == id) Ch. 6 §6.4
Slots OperationSlot::{Single, Equivocated}, the order-independent (Pass-10) transitions Ch. 6 §6.5
Anomalies AnomalousReplicaSegment, IntegrityAnomaly/Kind, the HLC-monotonicity detector Ch. 6 §6.6; Ch. 5 §"System-Derived Counter Collisions"
Effects OperationEffect, NoOpReason, the typed PreconditionFailureReason, RepairRecord/RepairKind Ch. 6 §6.3.2, §6.5
Conflicts ConflictRecord, ConflictKind, content-derived ConflictId (derive_conflict_id), the registry, resolution Ch. 6 §6.4
Transactions / undo TransactionDescriptor with the causal-prior-descriptor rule, UndoTransactionPayload / UndoPolicy Ch. 6 §6.6, §6.8
Operation set OperationSet: accept pipeline (well-formedness → slot → causal), grow-only Ch. 6 §"Envelope Acceptance"
Reduction canonical_reduction_order (single function), MaterializedState, the reduction driver Ch. 6 §6.3

The determinism this crate enforces

  1. A single reduction-order function. canonical_reduction_order performs deterministic causal topological ordering, using the intrinsic stamp tuple (physical, logical, replica, counter) only among ready operations.
  2. Order-independent equivocation. A duplicate OperationId with different canonical bytes transitions its slot to Equivocated regardless of which envelope arrived first (Pass 10). Equivocated slots contribute nothing to reduction; dependents are held pending.
  3. Content-derived facts. ConflictId and IntegrityAnomalyId are derived from content, so two replicas reducing the same set agree on every conflict and anomaly id — the conflict registry and anomaly register are deterministic materialized facts, not local bookkeeping.
  4. Byte-identical materialized state. MaterializedState::canonical_bytes serializes the effect log, conflict registry, anomaly register, object existence, spellings, and LWW fields in their normative orders.
  5. Real graph materialization. OperationSet::reduce_onto(&base_score) returns GraphMaterialization { state, score }. The graph is mutated in the same canonical order and compares by canonical event identity, independent of arena storage order.

Hand-off gates

Run the gate harnesses (QUICKSTART, Agent C):

cargo test -p epiphany-ops
cargo run --release -p epiphany-ops --example fuzz_reduction          # 10k iters, seed 0
cargo run --release -p epiphany-ops --example fuzz_reduction 100000 7 # soak, seed 7
  • Reduction determinism — every randomized envelope set reduces to byte-identical materialized state under any acceptance order (v0 acceptance criteria 1 and 5).
  • Equivocation order-independence — every duplicate-id-with-different-bytes scenario equivocates regardless of arrival order (v0 acceptance criterion 3).

The integration tests (tests/concurrent_reduction.rs) exercise these plus transaction atomicity, descriptor precedence, anomaly exclusion, and forward undo through the public API.

Scope and decisions

Chapter 6 specifies the framework and a representative selection of operations; the full ~6080-primitive catalog is an explicit open question (§6.11) deferred to the Operation Catalog companion. This crate implements the framework in full and the representative operations, which is sufficient to exercise every reduction discipline. The representative operations can also reduce onto an epiphany_core::Score: insert/delete, voice promotion, supported cross-cutting structures, system breaks, migration checks, transaction rollback, and undo mutate the real graph while preserving Agent B's invariants. reduce() remains the base-free CRDT/bookkeeping API; reduce_onto() is the graph-aware editing path. See DECISIONS.md for remaining payload boundaries.

Per QUICKSTART "Don't do these": undo is the spec's forward compensating operation, never inverse-based; unsafe is forbidden; everything is sync.