The ratified reasoning is untouched — every changed token is a bare line
number. What the contract argues, pins, and disposes of is unchanged;
only its pointers move, so a reader following them lands on the code the
sentences describe.
Ten, not the two first found: reduce.rs:4119 and :4117 both name
CreateStaff's group precondition, now :4372; invariants.rs:1126/:1135
name invariant 10's two resolution arms, now :1188/:1196; graph.rs:819
and :1614 name the two fields, now :848 and :1650, cited twice each.
core_spec.tex:5578 appears twice and needed two different corrections —
at the prose it quotes the doc line "Visual grouping: which staff group",
now :5585; in the pin-4b table it parallels :4231's struct declaration,
so it wants `pub struct Staff {`, now :5564. A single substitution would
have been wrong in one of the two places.
Forward, not by amendment: the contract is ratified and pushed, and its
hash is cited by the ledger and the genesis plan.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QjsEnYhm1gPpf6ii2iFxFV
Levi Neuwirth
f876836454