auto: 2026-03-26T13:10:19Z

This commit is contained in:
Levi Neuwirth 2026-03-26 09:10:19 -04:00
parent 728afd4c68
commit 866001ba7d
2 changed files with 17 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ Every essay and post on this site carries an **epistemic footer** — a structur
- **Evidence** — how well-evidenced the claims are, on the same 15 scale. An essay with high importance and low evidence is a speculative position and should be read accordingly. - **Evidence** — how well-evidenced the claims are, on the same 15 scale. An essay with high importance and low evidence is a speculative position and should be read accordingly.
- **Overall score** — a single 0100 integer derived automatically from the three quantitative fields above: confidence weighted at 50%, evidence at 30%, importance at 20%. It appears adjacent to the Epistemic link in the top metadata row and is not entered manually.
- **Scope**, **Novelty**, **Practicality** — optional qualitative fields in the expanded footer. *Scope* ranges from *personal* to *civilizational*; *novelty* from *conventional* to *innovative*; *practicality* from *abstract* to *exceptional*. These are not ratings — they are orientations. - **Scope**, **Novelty**, **Practicality** — optional qualitative fields in the expanded footer. *Scope* ranges from *personal* to *civilizational*; *novelty* from *conventional* to *innovative*; *practicality* from *abstract* to *exceptional*. These are not ratings — they are orientations.
- **Stability** — auto-computed at every build from `git log --follow`. The heuristic: very new or barely-touched documents are *volatile*; actively-revised documents are *revising*; older documents with more commits settle into *fairly stable*, *stable*, or *established*. This requires no manual maintenance — the build reads the repository history and makes the inference. - **Stability** — auto-computed at every build from `git log --follow`. The heuristic: very new or barely-touched documents are *volatile*; actively-revised documents are *revising*; older documents with more commits settle into *fairly stable*, *stable*, or *established*. This requires no manual maintenance — the build reads the repository history and makes the inference.

View File

@ -1,11 +1,22 @@
--- ---
title: "The Philosophical Legacy of Dostoevsky's Implicit Rejection of Logic and Science in Part I of <em>Notes from Underground</em>" title: "Empirical Musings on Spaced Repetition for Learning Beyond Memorization"
date: 2025-10-24 date: 2026-03-26
abstract: > abstract: >
*Notes from Underground* is widely admired as a cornerstone of literature, culture, and philosophy. This paper develops the argument that the primary philosophical undercurrent is a rejection of logic and science as end-alls in modern life, traced through comparison with the more explicitly articulated works of Dostoevsky's contemporaries and successors: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Shestov, Ellul, Sartre, Camus, Husserl, and Arendt. A compendium of years of informal, empirical experiments aimed at extending the efficacy of Anki beyond rote memorization to more intricate levels of learning.
tags: tags:
- nonfiction - nonfiction
- nonfiction/philosophy - research
- research/informal
- miscellany
authors: authors:
- "Levi Neuwirth | /me.html" - "Levi Neuwirth | /me.html"
status: "Draft"
confidence: 65
importance: 3
evidence: 2
scope: broad
novelty: idiosyncratic
practicality: high
confidence history:
- 65
--- ---