auto: 2026-03-26T13:10:19Z
This commit is contained in:
parent
728afd4c68
commit
866001ba7d
|
|
@ -136,6 +136,8 @@ Every essay and post on this site carries an **epistemic footer** — a structur
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Evidence** — how well-evidenced the claims are, on the same 1–5 scale. An essay with high importance and low evidence is a speculative position and should be read accordingly.
|
- **Evidence** — how well-evidenced the claims are, on the same 1–5 scale. An essay with high importance and low evidence is a speculative position and should be read accordingly.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **Overall score** — a single 0–100 integer derived automatically from the three quantitative fields above: confidence weighted at 50%, evidence at 30%, importance at 20%. It appears adjacent to the Epistemic link in the top metadata row and is not entered manually.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Scope**, **Novelty**, **Practicality** — optional qualitative fields in the expanded footer. *Scope* ranges from *personal* to *civilizational*; *novelty* from *conventional* to *innovative*; *practicality* from *abstract* to *exceptional*. These are not ratings — they are orientations.
|
- **Scope**, **Novelty**, **Practicality** — optional qualitative fields in the expanded footer. *Scope* ranges from *personal* to *civilizational*; *novelty* from *conventional* to *innovative*; *practicality* from *abstract* to *exceptional*. These are not ratings — they are orientations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Stability** — auto-computed at every build from `git log --follow`. The heuristic: very new or barely-touched documents are *volatile*; actively-revised documents are *revising*; older documents with more commits settle into *fairly stable*, *stable*, or *established*. This requires no manual maintenance — the build reads the repository history and makes the inference.
|
- **Stability** — auto-computed at every build from `git log --follow`. The heuristic: very new or barely-touched documents are *volatile*; actively-revised documents are *revising*; older documents with more commits settle into *fairly stable*, *stable*, or *established*. This requires no manual maintenance — the build reads the repository history and makes the inference.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,11 +1,22 @@
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
title: "The Philosophical Legacy of Dostoevsky's Implicit Rejection of Logic and Science in Part I of <em>Notes from Underground</em>"
|
title: "Empirical Musings on Spaced Repetition for Learning Beyond Memorization"
|
||||||
date: 2025-10-24
|
date: 2026-03-26
|
||||||
abstract: >
|
abstract: >
|
||||||
*Notes from Underground* is widely admired as a cornerstone of literature, culture, and philosophy. This paper develops the argument that the primary philosophical undercurrent is a rejection of logic and science as end-alls in modern life, traced through comparison with the more explicitly articulated works of Dostoevsky's contemporaries and successors: Nietzsche, Heidegger, Shestov, Ellul, Sartre, Camus, Husserl, and Arendt.
|
A compendium of years of informal, empirical experiments aimed at extending the efficacy of Anki beyond rote memorization to more intricate levels of learning.
|
||||||
tags:
|
tags:
|
||||||
- nonfiction
|
- nonfiction
|
||||||
- nonfiction/philosophy
|
- research
|
||||||
|
- research/informal
|
||||||
|
- miscellany
|
||||||
authors:
|
authors:
|
||||||
- "Levi Neuwirth | /me.html"
|
- "Levi Neuwirth | /me.html"
|
||||||
|
status: "Draft"
|
||||||
|
confidence: 65
|
||||||
|
importance: 3
|
||||||
|
evidence: 2
|
||||||
|
scope: broad
|
||||||
|
novelty: idiosyncratic
|
||||||
|
practicality: high
|
||||||
|
confidence history:
|
||||||
|
- 65
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue