auto: 2026-08-30T17:54:47Z [skip ci]
This commit is contained in:
parent
52a7482e80
commit
9fdf0e202f
|
|
@ -220,18 +220,27 @@ A profiler that only ever confirms its author is not a measurement instrument.
|
||||||
Predictions go out before the measurement, and get corrected in public when the
|
Predictions go out before the measurement, and get corrected in public when the
|
||||||
measurement disagrees — otherwise the numbers above would be worth very little.
|
measurement disagrees — otherwise the numbers above would be worth very little.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The correction is now upstream rather than only narrated here. The original
|
||||||
|
scorecard reported roughly 950 GB per sweep of cross-shard traffic and returned
|
||||||
|
a binding verdict on interconnect; with the traffic model corrected — settlement
|
||||||
|
vectors reduce to per-shard scalars rather than shipping whole — the same
|
||||||
|
configuration moves 2.4 to 2.8 GB per sweep, and communication is negligible at
|
||||||
|
every bandwidth swept. Nearly all of the original figure was my own modeling
|
||||||
|
error. The retraction is part of the merged record, not a footnote to it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### What is upstream, and what is not
|
### What is upstream, and what is not
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Merged code** — the dry-run profiler and its parts: manifest contract,
|
**Merged code** — the dry-run profiler and its parts: manifest contract,
|
||||||
extractor, cost model, execution DAG, partition scorecard; and the RMSNorm
|
extractor, cost model, execution DAG, partition scorecard; the RMSNorm
|
||||||
cost-model correction.
|
cost-model correction; and, as of 30 August 2026, the calibration suite, the
|
||||||
|
machine-profile tooling, and the corrected traffic model.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Publicly reported validation** — the B200 tape extraction and the measurements
|
**Publicly inspectable evidence** — the B200 session archive, the extracted
|
||||||
that came out of it, recorded in the profiler pull request itself.
|
manifests, the calibration logs, and the measured machine profile are all in the
|
||||||
|
repository. An earlier version of this section asked you to treat the figures
|
||||||
**Pending upstream** — the calibration suite, the machine-profile tooling, and
|
above as reported by me rather than independently checkable. That caveat has
|
||||||
the remaining B200 artifacts. Until those land, treat the figures above as
|
been discharged: the inputs that produced them can now be read, and the
|
||||||
reported by me rather than independently inspectable.
|
cross-checks rerun.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**On agent assistance.** Implementation was agent-assisted. I owned the research
|
**On agent assistance.** Implementation was agent-assisted. I owned the research
|
||||||
direction, the cost-model derivation and checking, the experimental design, the
|
direction, the cost-model derivation and checking, the experimental design, the
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -52,8 +52,10 @@ work is on proving multi-GPU, which is the ceiling on model scale, context
|
||||||
length, and mixture-of-experts breadth.
|
length, and mixture-of-experts breadth.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
::: {.work-limit}
|
::: {.work-limit}
|
||||||
**Ongoing.** The multi-GPU work is unmerged and its results are preliminary.
|
**Ongoing.** The profiler and calibration tooling are merged upstream; the
|
||||||
Technical write-up expected Q4 2026, for review and publication.
|
multi-GPU figures are projections from a validated cost model rather than
|
||||||
|
measurements at that scale. Technical write-up expected Q4 2026, for review and
|
||||||
|
publication.
|
||||||
:::
|
:::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
::: {.work-entry-links}
|
::: {.work-entry-links}
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue