auto: 2026-08-29T17:32:52Z [skip ci]
This commit is contained in:
parent
49d6d24fd8
commit
b837ac2813
|
|
@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ models, execute models against them, debug agent scaffolds when they fail, and
|
|||
analyze the failures that result. I have led environment design and evaluator
|
||||
calibration; most of it is built in [Harbor](https://github.com/harbor-framework/harbor).
|
||||
|
||||
Calibration passes often reveal that a rubric is measuring something other than
|
||||
what the task was designed to measure: a task-design failure, not a grading one.
|
||||
I calibrate before a task is scaled, because redesigning a task is cheap and
|
||||
rescoring a finished run is not.
|
||||
|
||||
For a similar methodology on public data, see [The Specification
|
||||
Dilemma](/essays/specification-dilemma/) — pre-registered, matched-pairs, with
|
||||
its instrumentation failures reported in full.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue