neuwirth
/
levineuwirth.org
1
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

auto: 2026-04-11T23:09:55Z

This commit is contained in:
Levi Neuwirth 2026-04-11 19:09:55 -04:00
parent 1be9c7f3d1
commit f7d972bf05
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
content/colophon.md
View File

@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ Every essay and post on this site carries an **epistemic footer** — a structur
- **Evidence** — how well-evidenced the claims are, on the same 1–5 scale. An essay with high importance and low evidence is a speculative position and should be read accordingly. - **Evidence** — how well-evidenced the claims are, on the same 1–5 scale. An essay with high importance and low evidence is a speculative position and should be read accordingly.
- **Overall score** — a single 0–100 integer derived automatically from the three quantitative fields above: confidence weighted at 50%, evidence at 30%, importance at 20%. It appears adjacent to the Epistemic link in the top metadata row and is not entered manually. - **Overall score** — a single 0–100 integer derived automatically from confidence (weighted 60%) and evidence (weighted 40%, with the 1–5 scale rescaled so that evidence=1 contributes zero and evidence=5 contributes the full 40 points). Importance is intentionally excluded: it answers "should you read this?", not "should you trust it?", and folding the two together produced inflated numbers. The score appears adjacent to the Epistemic link in the top metadata row and is not entered manually.
- **Scope**, **Novelty**, **Practicality** — optional qualitative fields in the expanded footer. *Scope* ranges from *personal* to *civilizational*; *novelty* from *conventional* to *innovative*; *practicality* from *abstract* to *exceptional*. These are not ratings — they are orientations. - **Scope**, **Novelty**, **Practicality** — optional qualitative fields in the expanded footer. *Scope* ranges from *personal* to *civilizational*; *novelty* from *conventional* to *innovative*; *practicality* from *abstract* to *exceptional*. These are not ratings — they are orientations.