docs(lane): 1b's implementation and evidence are complete
Both owed lists are now empty. Nothing is landed-but-unwitnessed, and nothing is owed outright; the next step is the full pre-PR gate. The three that closed are recorded with what each actually required, because two of them were not simply "write the row": Step 3's witness needed the ORDER to be the argument --- 0.6 vertical then 0.6 horizontal, both reaching nothing --- since a shared accumulator would have the second complete the first. B1's disposal half needed mechanism. BufferId keying distinguishes panel A from panel B for free but cannot see a panel closed and reopened on the same persistent buffer, and the Absent arm reset nine pieces of panel state one line at a time with the wheel residual missing from the list. That is the third time this lane has found the same omission shape: a hand-maintained reset list with one field left off it.
This commit is contained in:
parent
241e82e30e
commit
45775c0691
|
|
@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ Framing
|
|||
this base, the panel-replay prerequisite recorded as DISCHARGED by #243,
|
||||
and the both-axis effect witness still owed.
|
||||
|
||||
**Landed so far** (latest verified code head `7f7f156`)**:** B1's per-target fractional
|
||||
**Landed so far** (latest verified code head `241e82e`)**:** B1's per-target fractional
|
||||
wheel residual (the producer), B2's daemon-side horizontal panel leg,
|
||||
B3/B7's shared `scroll_window_columns` with its saturated bound and wrap
|
||||
pin, B4's middle-click PRIMARY paste, **B6's minimap wheel routing**,
|
||||
|
|
@ -488,19 +488,31 @@ that full `reshape` clears, so it positively proves the incremental
|
|||
branch ran; unchanged line count alone would only make that branch
|
||||
eligible, not establish that `try_reshape_line` succeeded.
|
||||
|
||||
**Landed but NOT yet witnessed:**
|
||||
**Nothing is landed-but-unwitnessed on this lane any more.** R4 and R5
|
||||
now have their replacement rows (`e5ab16c`), one clear omitted at a
|
||||
time so neither field hides behind the other's reset; the wrap and
|
||||
buffer-replacement clearing that stood here is covered by L8 and
|
||||
L8b–L8e, and that bullet's GPU half described the latch that no longer
|
||||
exists.
|
||||
|
||||
- **R4 and R5's residual resets**, as two separate clears beside
|
||||
`code_scroll_left` so omitting either is individually visible.
|
||||
**Owed outright: nothing. The implementation and its evidence are
|
||||
complete**, and the lane's next step is the full pre-PR gate.
|
||||
|
||||
(The wrap and buffer-replacement clearing that stood here is done: the
|
||||
TUI's four replacement paths carry L8b–L8e, wrap carries L8, and the
|
||||
GPU half of that bullet described the latch that no longer exists.)
|
||||
The last three closed in order:
|
||||
|
||||
**Owed outright:** step 3's fractional both-axis panel witness, R4/R5's
|
||||
own replacement witnesses, and **B1's disposal half** — a residual keyed to a surface that goes
|
||||
away must go with it, and this frontend does not yet track "that buffer
|
||||
is gone".
|
||||
- **step 3's fractional both-axis panel witness** (`302ce14`) — 0.6
|
||||
vertical, then 0.6 horizontal, both reaching nothing, because a
|
||||
single accumulator fed by both axes would have the second complete
|
||||
the first. Rounding instead of banking fires the sub-threshold legs;
|
||||
collapsing the axes fires the cross-axis one.
|
||||
- **R4 and R5** (`e5ab16c`).
|
||||
- **B1's disposal half** (`241e82e`) — and it needed mechanism, not
|
||||
just a row. `BufferId` keying distinguishes panel A from panel B for
|
||||
free, but **not a panel closed and reopened on the same persistent
|
||||
buffer**, where the successor carries the same key. The `Absent` arm
|
||||
reset nine pieces of panel state one line at a time with the wheel
|
||||
residual missing from the list — the same omission shape as the
|
||||
horizontal origin missing from the TUI's four replacement resets.
|
||||
|
||||
**B6 (`2dccc2b`, tightened in `f441d3d`)** is three rows on
|
||||
`EffectHarness`, the first production-path coverage `apply_wheel` has
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue