The portable manifest collapsed the two clean-split directions even though
the governing endpoint table permits a bisect only when 7599661 is uniform
green and 724b785 is uniform red. Preserve that direction explicitly, and
carry the same distinction in the compact active-work summary.
The inverted split remains a real difference, but it contradicts the onset
reading and therefore requires that reading to be re-examined before any
bisect.
74dbd34 corrected the framing so that "the difference is not captured"
attaches to the uniform-same endpoint verdicts rather than to mixed ---
mixed means intermittency --- but the manifest kept the wrong pairing.
The edit's anchor did not match and the script reported success anyway,
so the commit touched only active-work.md and the framing.
The manifest now defers to §7 D0a for the governing contract and states
the three verdicts with the conclusions that actually belong to them:
clean split permits the bisect, mixed means intermittency under fixed
source, both-uniform-same means the difference is not captured by those
two commits.
Process note, since this is the third silent no-op of its kind in this
lane: an unasserted string replace that misses its anchor is
indistinguishable from one that succeeded. Every edit here now asserts
the anchor before writing and re-asserts the result afterwards.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Four findings on revision 7, all upheld.
1. The old one-run D0 rule survived in three durable places --- the
manifest, this branch's ledger, and the framing's own §4a --- each
still permitting a bisect when the endpoints merely "differ". That
contradicts the N = 5 clean-split contract added in revision 7. All
three now defer to that contract, and §4a's "needs only that the two
clean endpoints differ now" is marked as the superseded rule it is.
2. D0a still overstated its evidence, in three ways now fixed:
- "context-sensitive by construction, appearing only in the full
sweep" is downgraded to what has been OBSERVED so far;
- the historical 7/7 and 13/13 are stated as NOT endpoint-specific
rates --- of seven reds only F6 ran at 724b785, of the greens only
the last at 7599661, both with unknown cleanliness;
- five runs are named a PREDEFINED EVIDENTIARY THRESHOLD chosen so
the outcome cannot be argued after the fact, not something that
mathematically separates intermittency.
And the bisect now specifies its own classifier: every intermediate
commit uses the identical N = 5 protocol, and a mixed classification
ABORTS the bisect rather than being guessed, skipped, or rerun until
it agrees. A bisect with cheaper steps than its endpoints would
inherit the weakness the contract exists to remove.
3. The artifacts column is now exact per run, read from each log:
R1/R2 UNKNOWN (no log preserved), R3 -5d9105cb/-d4dae4f0, R4 and R5
-6b4b8223 only, R6 -91f51d0b/-6b4b8223. R8's citation was half2.log:1;
the executable lines are 438 and 459. The framing's last "not same
binaries" is now "not the same compilations".
4. (Held ledger, 5274d6b.) It named a stale ledger tip and two different
framing revisions on consecutive lines.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Five findings on revision 6, all upheld.
1. The ancestry pair supports nothing causal. Revision 6 had already
retreated to "outcome is not determined by commit alone"; that is
withdrawn too, because different commits CAN deterministically
produce different outcomes --- this document's own fix-then-regression
scenario is an example. The two observations differ in commit AND
environment AND time, so they are simply NON-COMPARABLE. The held
ledger's "no source-monotonic cause does that" goes with it.
2. D0a was not a valid decision procedure: one unspecified run per
endpoint cannot establish a regression for a failure that only
appears in the full sweep. Now specified --- N = 5 full sweep-crdt
runs per endpoint, INTERLEAVED A/B/A/B so session drift hits both
arms, identical captured conditions including uptime/free//tmp/
leaked-daemon count, and a bisect permitted ONLY on a clean split.
A mixed result means intermittency under fixed source, and no bisect
is justified at all.
3. "Neither binary contains signal-handling code" is FALSE. The pmacs
binary does: install_signal_handlers (src/daemon.rs:628) registers
SIGINT and SIGTERM; it is simply not on run_gpu's path. A grep of
project sources also cannot exclude a runtime or dependency
installing a disposition. The established fact is narrow --- no
explicit installation on run_gpu's path --- and "whatever disposition
they hold was inherited" is restored to a HYPOTHESIS that D2 must
measure.
4. Artifact wording finished: no "artifact family", "reduction/
workspace artifacts" or "different binaries" remain. Every manifest
row now carries its exact Cargo suffixes read from its log, with a
stated caveat that those logs are machine-local and this manifest is
the portable transcription of them.
5. Held ledger pointed at revision 5; it now points at revision 7.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Three findings on revision 5, all upheld.
1. The ancestry argument overreached. 72da24a failing today while its
descendant 7599661 passed on 08-15 shows exactly one thing: outcome
is not determined by commit alone, since the observations come from
different environments at different times. Revision 5 said a source
cause was "positively discouraged", that the ancestry "says to
expect" equal endpoints, and that the change was environmental.
None follows. It cannot discriminate an environmental change, a
source/environment interaction, or a fix before 7599661 with a
regression before 724b785 --- and an ancestor OUTSIDE the interval
is irrelevant to whether the interval regressed, since a bisect over
7599661..724b785 needs only that the clean endpoints differ now.
D0a is unchanged as an action but is now stated as a decision
procedure with NO predicted outcome: endpoints differ -> bisect that
interval; endpoints agree -> ask what else changed across the window.
2. The byte-identity withdrawal was incomplete in both ledgers. This
branch's said the artifacts "are byte-different" and then withdrew
it two lines later, still said R9 ran "different binaries", and
still promised an "artifact family". The held ledger still said
"byte-different" and still called the window a bisect target with
revision 4's onset conclusion. Both now say "different Cargo
suffixes/compilations" throughout; historical byte identity is
UNKNOWN and is never claimed.
3. Provenance slips: R9's observation-table row listed only -6b4b8223
although it executed both -91f51d0b and -6b4b8223; R10's suffixes
are at log lines 3 and 24, not 3 and 4; R9's are at 3066 and 3087,
not 3066 alone. All corrected against the logs.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Four findings on revision 4, all upheld. The third changes what the
lane should do next.
1. Section summaries still carried revision-3 language while the
manifest carried revision 4's. Framing and ledger now agree: seven
red runs (F1-F7), not five; the observation table is keyed on
compilation set rather than an invented "workspace artifact family";
and it is labelled an observation, not an isolated interaction.
2. The onset count was wrong. Per test copy across the 17 sweep-crdt
logs: 13 with both copies ok, 1 where NEITHER executed because the
stage died compiling pmacs (error[E0308]), and 3 with both failed.
Revision 4's "14 runs, 11 green, 3 red on other tests" mis-stated
both the count and the kind --- one of those runs never reached the
test. The two genuinely red-on-other-tests sweeps did execute
ctrl_c, and it passed.
3. D0a cannot be a source bisect, and the evidence argues against one.
Reflog and commit times put HEAD at 7599661 during the last green
(3c06176 landed 40s after it finished) and at 724b785 during the
first red (5174f73 landed 08:45:41, after that run ended 08:42:01;
the manifest had recorded F6 at 5174f73, which was wrong).
Cleanliness was captured at neither endpoint. And 72da24a is an
ANCESTOR of the passing 7599661 yet fails today --- no
source-monotonic cause produces that. D0a now reproduces the two
endpoints CLEAN, in isolated target directories, and a bisect is
justified only if they differ.
4. Manifest completed: R9 carries full argv rather than a recipe; R7
lists only gpu_invocation-6b4b8223, since R7 does not select
gpu_initial_target; R10 lists both -5d9105cb and -d4dae4f0.
Also withdraws "byte-different" everywhere. The bytes a historical run
executed are not knowable --- target dirs have been overwritten, and a
hash computed today is the current occupant's. Three levels are now kept
apart in the manifest: suffix (known), today's bytes at a path (known),
and the bytes a past run executed (UNKNOWN). Differing suffixes mean
differing Cargo metadata hashes, which is enough to void the comparison
and is all that is claimed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Four findings on revision 3, all upheld. Answering finding 1 turned up
something that reframes the lane.
THE ONSET. sweep-crdt appears SEVENTEEN times in this target directory's
gate logs. The ctrl_c failure appears in exactly the LAST THREE, and the
test passed --- both copies, "... ok" --- inside the stage before them.
Last green 20260815T185708Z, first red 20260816T063330Z, no reboot
between. The three earlier red sweeps failed on unrelated rows. So
"pre-existing on main" holds (F1 at 72da24a reproduces it) but "always
broken" was never established and is now contradicted. D0 gains a first
part: bisect that window. A test that passed fourteen times in this
stage and then failed three times running has a change behind it, and
that is worth more than further reduction --- which has isolated
nothing.
1. Both ledgers still carried the falsified R9 conclusions. This branch
listed --workspace unification and preceding tests as ruled out
while the section above described an interaction; said "five call
sites" immediately before correcting to six; and labelled the
framing revision 2. The held branch was worse: --workspace refuted,
R9 "same binaries", later packages not implicable, cause cumulative
across 37 binaries. All corrected and pushed (5b9abd8). §11 no
longer asserts the held lane is clean; it records a re-verified
checklist, since asserting that prematurely is what went wrong.
2. Manifest now carries complete argv for R7-R9 and F5 --- abbreviations
are not reconstructable invocations. F5 is disambiguated: the
framing cited gate ...-2144707 while the manifest cited ...-2375685,
two distinct real runs. Enumerating them gives F1-F7: the red count
is SEVEN, not five, each with its own log digest. F5 also carries an
extra failing binary the others do not.
3. "Workspace artifact family" conflated Cargo suffix with byte
identity and is withdrawn as a grouping. Demonstrated: F1 in the
main worktree executed the same suffixes -5d9105cb and -d4dae4f0,
but the bytes there are e0578039/00f06aeb versus the panel
worktree's 1b3cc86c/ede0c07d. Each run now records the suffix its
log shows and byte identity as UNKNOWN, since target dirs have been
overwritten and a hash computed today is not the hash that ran.
4. The interaction table is demoted to a description of what was
observed. Revision 3 disclaimed its inputs and then asserted a
finding from them, which cannot both hold. A3 no longer speaks of an
established "R9 paradox" --- there is none to explain, because the
comparison was never made; it requires D0 to recreate it first.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Five findings on revision 2, all upheld. The first invalidates its
strongest claim.
1. R9 executed gpu_initial_target_acceptance-91f51d0b and
gpu_invocation_acceptance-6b4b8223; the failing sweeps executed
-5d9105cb and -d4dae4f0. Verified byte-different by sha256. Cargo's
target selection changes the fingerprint, so command shape changes
the executable. "Same binaries" is now "same target names and
order". What the evidence supports is an INTERACTION --- prior
targets alone green (R9), workspace artifacts alone green (R10),
both together red (F1-F5) --- so --workspace selection is not
sufficient by itself and NOT ruled out. The claim that other
packages "cannot be implicated" because their targets run after the
failure is withdrawn: later-selected packages can affect the build
graph and fingerprints before their tests ever run.
2. Both ledgers made internally consistent and portable. This branch's
asserted default-disposition death and then withdrew it further
down; the assertion is gone. panel-mapping-generation still carried
"119 binaries green one red", the >=8s arithmetic, the default-action
claim and the >6s selector --- corrected on its own branch and pushed
at 779a6bd.
3. Provenance is now a pushed document, docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md:
exact command, worktree, HEAD, cleanliness, artifact family, result
and log digest per physical run. R1 and R2 have no preserved log,
and revision 2 double-counted one log as both R2 and R6. Cleanliness
is UNKNOWN for every pre-manifest run and is not inferred. R1-R10
ran in the panel-mapping-generation worktree, not at main. D0 now
precedes every other diagnostic: re-run the matrix at main under a
harness capturing provenance AND the artifact hashes executed.
4. "The probe never blocks indefinitely" narrowed to "the event loop
wakes at least every 50ms". The stdin reader blocks in read_to_end
(:1109) and, once ready, the loop leaves only when stdin closes
(:1212), so the process is not bounded.
5. Launcher call sites: six under --features crdt (:509 :534 :544 :574
:725 :1097, inside #[cfg(feature = "crdt")] mod crdt). The other two
--gpu arguments are under #[cfg(not(...))] and compiled out.
Revision 2 said five while citing eight.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Levi Neuwirth