Recorded as "implementation authorized" rather than "approved", because
that is what happened: the user authorized dispatch after a summary of
revision 2 four corrections, not after returning findings on the
document the way they did for the other four lanes.
The distinction matters for one reason. Section 3 .texlabroot caveat is
unverified and blocking --- texlab 5.25.1 is installed and its version
and CLI were checked, but the CLI exposes only run and inverse-search,
so its LSP-level behaviour was never established. A framing marked
plainly "approved" invites a reader to treat that caveat as settled
prose. It is step zero of the work.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Revision 1 was untracked, on main, in a single checkout. By the handoff
own rule --- work is portable only after it is committed and pushed ---
it did not travel. Committing it here is the first fix.
Three factual corrections, all from checking rather than reading.
haskell-language-server IS installed on this machine, along with its
wrapper. Revision 1 said it was not, and that claim was the entire
basis of its Slice 1 / Slice 2 split. Only OCaml still lacks a server.
The argument for leaving Haskell out survives, but on use evidence ---
the .hs files are a rarely-edited Hakyll generator --- not on
dependency cost.
Slice 1 is smaller than framed. Revision 1 proposed filetype mappings
for .tex/.latex/.sty/.cls "so highlighting and LSP agree on what a
LaTeX file is". They already agree, by construction: the grammar
carries exactly those extensions at src/syntax.rs:1111,
grammar-extension detection sits AHEAD of the LSP filetype map in the
precedence chain per the merged grammar framing at :166-171, and
lsp.lua:267-270 calls the filetype map "mainly the LSP-only fallback".
The real missing piece is one config entry.
Q#LX3 deferral argument read a stale line. COHERENCE.md:124 and :867
both record multi-root LSP affinity as merged in #161; only :1669 still
says "first slice in flight", contradicting the same document twice.
The one item revision 1 said could justify deferring therefore
dissolves. The COHERENCE.md inconsistency is real and is left for
whoever next touches section 20 rather than smuggled in here.
Q#LX2, which revision 1 called the question most likely to make the
entry wrong in practice, is now answered rather than shrugged at. An
upward marker walk through config.latex.root, which already accepts a
resolver function. .git is deliberately excluded: a repository root is
the wrong answer for LaTeX, since texlab wants the document root, and
this is the one place where copying the other fourteen entries
instinct would be actively wrong.
The .texlabroot marker is marked UNVERIFIED and blocking. texlab 5.25.1
is installed and its version and CLI were checked directly, but the CLI
exposes only run and inverse-search, so its LSP-level behaviour was not
established. Confirm against a live session before implementing. Same
discipline the gate-protocol-build lane applies to its own
precondition: the thing the design rests on gets observed, not
reasoned about.
Also renumbered Q#HS1 to Q#LX4, because revision 1 Q#LX2 collided with
a live question ID in the merged grammar framing for the same language.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Levi Neuwirth