Five findings, all real. The blocker and both majors are the same
mistake in three places: a claim asserted somewhere cheaper than where
it actually lives.
COHERENCE.md was stale in four places, not the three reported. Step 8
still read "no keybinding" and §11 still read "five settings", but §6's
dispatch table also still cited `is_terminal_escape_chord` — a symbol
this branch deletes. §25 requires that update to ride the PR, so a PR
changing audited ground truth has to re-grep the audit for its own
symbols, not only for its topic.
Acceptance 5 asserted a registry round-trip, which is a test of the
registry: it stayed green with the setting's only consumer deleted. It
now opens a real terminal whose child overflows the 24-row screen,
scrolls the view to its oldest retained row, and asserts LINE001 is
present at 10,000 and absent at 0.
Acceptance 8a waited for the session count to fall, which the rejected
editor-side cache map satisfies exactly — a map with no purge hook
leaks while sessions drain. Adds `TerminalManager::escape_caches()`, the
lifetime half of Q#TC4c's contract that `escape_parses` cannot cover.
`table.sort` over `pmacs.terminal.profiles` raised "attempt to compare
number with string" on the unknown-profile path whenever the user's
table held both a string and a numeric key, replacing the exact
diagnostic being asked for; `%q` raised likewise on a non-string
`profile` argument. Both are partial functions applied to user input on
a diagnostic path.
Also corrects the framing's status line, and a status message whose
embedded whitespace run had survived a rustfmt reflow.
Three new bites, each falsified by revert: deleting the scrollback
consumer fails acc5 and only acc5; restoring the raw-key sort
reproduces the comparison error verbatim; and implementing the rejected
map fails the new acc8a at left: 2, right: 1 while passing the old
session-count version.
Merges githubsucks/main @ ccf29e3.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016gGQC6eqHJVbZJ5Hg7aLer
Brings the three required docs current after #158 merged, and discharges
the follow-up that framing named for itself.
COHERENCE.md section 16 audits the claim that the GPU frontend exceeds
the TUI "under real divergence pressure" without a privileged frontend
emerging. Inline math is the sharpest instance of that so far -- the GPU
typesets $...$ while the TUI shows LaTeX source, and the TUI fallback is
a named deferral. Section 25 makes that update ride the PR, so the
enumerated list gains the case along with what keeps it inside the rule:
the slice reserves no protocol version and adds no wire surface, so the
divergence is presentational and both frontends read the same model.
docs/inline-math-framing.md carried a licence error the slice framing
flagged in its own section 9 and deliberately did not fix in-branch,
since the parent is a merged document. Latin Modern Math is under the
GUST Font License, not the OFL; the row now says so and records the
~717 KiB bundled size.
docs/agent-handoff.md records the landing and re-anchors section 1 to
d152120. The bullet leads with the facts a fresh agent would otherwise
have to rediscover: the whole slice lives in pmacs-gpu because pmacs-gpu
depends only on pmacs-protocol and never on pmacs; the v0 subset is 34
Greek symbols, sub/superscript and \frac; an unsupported command fails
the WHOLE span back to source, so most inline spans in a real paper
still show LaTeX by design; and math is suppressed while the caret is
inside its span.
docs/active-work.md removes the merged lane per its own update protocol
and adds a Closed entry. Four things there are reusable beyond this arc:
a stale frontend binary is invisible from the source tree, so diagnose
with strings on the binary rather than by re-reading a checkout that is
already current; the dangerous integration was the one that did NOT
conflict, so decide from the shared-file set rather than from whether
git complained; integration is proved by predicting the other side's
test-count delta and checking it; and m4_5_basedpyright has no timeout,
hangs forever, and is intermittent, so an earlier clean sweep proves
nothing. It also corrects a claim I recorded on main: the branch's
missing CI was not an unidentified cause -- a conflicting PR builds no
merge ref, so no pull_request run is created.
Docs only; no code changes.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HZjWMjwPXhPbt9upku9mCk
Main moved again while this lane was gating: the GPU terminal-input fix
merged as #166. One conflict, in COHERENCE.md's journey table, resolved
as the union -- this lane owns step 7's file half, #166 owns step 8's
GPU-terminal addendum.
Multi-root LSP affinity merged as #161 (`main` @ `46a1b8f`) while this
lane was in review, which made the PR conflict -- and a conflicting PR
has no merge ref, so GitHub silently stopped running CI on it after the
first push. Integrating rather than rebasing, per the #135/#137
precedent: the review anchors stay addressable and every gate is rerun
against the merged tree.
One conflict, in COHERENCE.md's in-flight list, resolved as the union of
both truths -- and #161 is now merged, which its own text still called a
PR.
The overlap to watch is `src/lua_bindings/mod.rs`: #161 widened the
`lsp.list()` row builder while this lane added `pmacs.path` and the
read_dir listing conversion. The merge was textually clean, which the
folding arc's lesson says is not the same as compiling, so the full gate
suite reruns from here.
COHERENCE.md section 25 and the handoff/ledger update protocols make
these ride the PR.
COHERENCE.md:
- Section 6 named one optimistic key classifier and attributed it to the
GPU. There are two, one per replica frontend:
crate::optimistic::classify_key belongs to the pmacs --attach TUI
replica, and pmacs-gpu has its own unrelated optimistic_insert_text /
optimistic_crdt_insert. The section's "kept honest by
dispatch_idle_for" claim is confirmed for both, which this
investigation verified rather than assumed.
- Section 16 graded per-frontend degradation strong on the evidence of
per-frontend fold projection. That grade stands, but the practice is
enforced by convention rather than structure, and this defect is the
counter-example; the note says so and points at what is now structural.
- Section 2 step 8 records that the terminal was broken outright on the
GPU frontend, not merely undiscoverable.
docs/agent-handoff.md section 5 gains four lessons: adjacency does not
make two operations alternatives (and two individually sound idempotence
guards can be jointly useless); bite against every pre-image the fix
could have taken, since the obvious guard here fixes the storm and
introduces a controller leak; a quiet child is an instrument, because a
frame storm hides inside a chatty fixture and a geometric readout is
satisfied by an oscillating geometry; and TerminalMode::Raw makes
sh-based input fixtures useless because there is no ICRNL.
docs/active-work.md gains the lane entry with the branch, the bite
matrix, the named out-of-scope items, and the gate results.
docs/dired-framing.md rev 6: §0 gains the Stage 1 implementation notes
(S1-1..S1-9) -- the normalizer is exposed rather than mirrored (so B2 is
false by one small binding, in the direction Q#DR2 preferred); R2-3's
dedication claim is falsified by the display policy; acceptance 3c
cannot pin the descent routing and now says so; dired is the first
builtin to bind a mode-scoped key, which one pre-existing lib test
assumed impossible; `C-x d` takes no completion source on purpose;
ownership is the handle table alone; the mark column ships blank; a
symlinked directory needs a probe; and interactive origin does not
survive an await.
COHERENCE.md, per its §25 (an audited claim this PR changes updates
here, riding the PR): §1.1's interactive-file-opening fact, §2's journey
step 7, §4's beginner-level `files`, §14's tree bullet (Stage 1 landed a
flat listing and did NOT invent a tree convention), and §15's Priority 1
list. Step 3 stays **Missing at the CLI** with the mechanism spelled
out: `pmacs .` still exits 1, and this arc deliberately does not claim
the CLI path -- it supplies the buffer a directory should resolve to.
docs/active-work.md: the dired lane rewritten for Stage 1, including why
the branch is a fresh cut rather than a rebase of `dired`, the durable
substrate facts, the bite results (one VACUOUS, recorded rather than
relabelled), and the verification. Its canonical-base line was four
merges stale and now names 8c86d34.
docs/agent-handoff.md: one forward pointer only. The handoff describes
merged state, so it absorbs the substance when this merges.
Rides this PR per COHERENCE.md §25 ("when a PR changes any audited claim
here, updating this file rides that PR").
§0 and §7: multi-root LSP affinity moves from in-flight-branch to PR
#161, and §7 gains the rule the slice actually establishes — a
*fallback* root is deliberately NOT an identity, so markerless files
keep sharing one server per language. That is the part a reader would
otherwise assume went the other way.
§1.2 gains the finding this PR turned up, which sharpens the audit
rather than restating it. The section recorded that background failures
produce "no `*errors*` entry"; the sharper fact is that **the channel
does not exist**. Fifteen call sites — `async.lua` (5), `syntax.lua`
(4), and one each in `lsp.lua`, `mcp.lua`, `fs.lua`, `editops.lua`,
`autosave.lua`, `commands/default.lua` — report through `pmacs.error`,
each guarded `if pmacs.error then ...`. It is defined nowhere in
production; the only assignment in the tree is a test stub
(`src/editor.rs:9881`), and `type(pmacs.error)` is nil in a fresh
`EditorState` (probed, not inferred). `pmacs.errors` plural in
compile.lua is an unrelated namespace. All fifteen are dead, and the
guard is what kept it unnoticed — it makes the silence read as
deliberate.
Hence the corollary now recorded beside the rule: report through a
channel with a **test that observes it**, or the guard is
indistinguishable from the silence it was meant to fix.
Also a frequency note: per-root affinity makes the
preconfigured-but-missing-server failure fire once per project root
rather than once per language per session. Unchanged in kind, strictly
more frequent. Surfacing it stays Priority 1 work needing its own
framing — it is user-visible product behavior (what message, where,
with what guidance), not a substrate fix to smuggle into an affinity PR.
Line-number citations in the touched sections re-verified per §25;
symbols are authoritative where they drifted.
COHERENCE.md states the product-coherence thesis (pmacs should be
immediately excellent, progressively understandable, completely
inspectable, and ultimately replaceable) and, per-section, the audited
ground truth of how the codebase measures against it: a scorecard
across 19 concerns, the golden-journey verdict table (breaks at "open a
real project" -- `pmacs .` exits 1), the six hardcoded key-interception
shadows with no transient-keymap mechanism to migrate them to, the
discoverability substrate-without-surface gap, the package/worker
identity gap, and three cross-cutting patterns (substrate without
surface, the silence asymmetry, per-arc coherence debt) that explain
most of the individual findings.
CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md now list it as required reading alongside
agent-handoff.md and active-work.md, and ask new framing docs to state
their coherence impact. No runtime code changes.
Levi Neuwirth