Drops the policy-A exclusivity that left grammar-backed languages
without LSP semantic refinement. Adds tree-sitter-c (.c/.h) and
tree-sitter-cpp (.cpp/.cc/.cxx/.hpp/...) to the bundle so the grid
TUI gets lexical highlighting (keywords / strings / operators) on
first open. The Lua attach in builtin/runtime/lsp.lua now pushes
LspStyleView whenever an LSP server is up, regardless of grammar
presence; with both views attached the cell-painter pipeline runs
SyntaxHighlightView first (lexical) then LspStyleView (semantic)
and their styles compose through crate::overlay::merge_styles. The
result is the VSCode / Zed "TextMate + LSP semantic tokens" model
on a terminal grid: keywords colored by tree-sitter, identifiers
refined by clangd's semantic tokens.
`.h` is ambiguous C / C++; the `c` BUILTIN_LANGUAGES entry claims it
to match the LSP filetype map's default. Users who want `.h` parsed
as C++ can override via Lua (extension → language map).
Note the tree-sitter-c / -cpp crates expose `HIGHLIGHT_QUERY`
(singular), matching tree-sitter-md's `HIGHLIGHT_QUERY_BLOCK`
convention; tree-sitter-rust / -lua use `HIGHLIGHTS_QUERY` (plural).
Same bundled highlights.scm either way.
Regression guard: builtin_languages_include_c_and_cpp asserts the
language entries exist and claim their canonical extensions. The
LspStyleView module doc rewritten to reflect dual-authority
composition; the existing headline test's comment updated (the
test fixture still attaches only LspStyleView directly, so its
asserted cells reflect the LSP authority alone — Lua-level
attach_buffer is what exercises composition end-to-end).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Land the Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration as a transport binding,
not a built-in feature. Six Lua functions plus userdata methods expose
the substance of three MCP feature areas (resources, tools, prompts), a
notification dispatcher, and a non-trivial AI-assistance example package
that meets the architectural ship gate (spec/pmacs-spec.tex:1572): zero
direct calls into the Rust core, zero special-cased MCP handling outside
the public API, source under 2000 lines of Lua.
The M9.5 -> M9.6 -> M9.7 -> M9.8 layered composition validates the claim
"AI is a transport binding, not a feature" -- pmacs-mcp-ai composes with
pmacs-mcp-prompts.render and inherits notification handling transitively
through M9.7's package, demonstrating that the AI domain is a layer
above MCP, not a thread woven through the core.
Subtask shape:
M9.1 stdio transport + initialize handshake + restart policy
M9.2 resources with in-flight + settled cache and per-uri invalidation
M9.3 tools with isError-vs-JSON-RPC-error semantics + cancellation
M9.4 prompts with required-argument validation
M9.5 notification dispatcher (on_notification, off_notification)
M9.6 tools-as-commands fixture package + 12 audit findings disposed
M9.7 prompts-as-result-buffers fixture package + tree-sitter-md grammar
M9.8 AI-assistance fixture package (363+ LoC; 17/17 acceptance tests)
M9.9 formal package audit -- PASS on all three criteria
M9.10 release: TRANSITION-M9.md + MCP-for-package-authors guide
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Levi Neuwirth