Implements `docs/journey-stage1b1-compile-defaults-framing.md`
(approved at revision 2). Lua, tests and docs; no Rust change and no
protocol change.
`C-c c` now runs `compile.run`, and the first prompt is prefilled from
the detected project kind through `pmacs.compile.defaults` — seeded
`rust = "cargo build"` and extensible from `init.lua`. `_last` still
wins, so a session that has compiled keeps its own command.
The prompt CAPTURES its directory rather than re-resolving it. Sharing
one resolver between the prompt and the run is necessary and not
sufficient: `pmacs.minibuffer.read` is asynchronous and nothing freezes
the active window while a prompt is open, so two calls to the same
resolver at two different moments are still two different answers — the
user could be offered `cargo build` for A and handed a run in B by
clicking away mid-prompt. This is Journey Stage 1a's `commit_to`
discipline on a smaller seam.
`pmacs.compile.defaults` is public and assignable, so the lookup is
guarded: a throwing `__index`, a non-string entry and a non-table
replacement all degrade to the pre-stage empty prompt and never
prevent compiling.
Only `rust` ships seeded. Rust has one answer; npm/yarn/pnpm,
make/cmake, and `go build` versus `go test` do not, and a wrong prefill
costs more than an empty one.
Adds eight step-9 rows to the journey ratchet and five module pins to
the compile suite. Corrects `COHERENCE.md`, which named a
`ProjectKind::Cargo` that does not exist — the variant is `Rust`, line
77 is its doc comment, and Lua only ever sees the tag string "rust".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Lv428Fth9LRtffwJSsqH7T
Review round 1 of PR #182. One implementation gap and two stale claims.
**The scope pins the frontend; it does not pin the window.** Framing
§4.4 specified `display{ window = dest:window() }`, but dired's commit
still ended in `pmacs.window.switch_buffer`, which targets whatever
window the scoped frontend has selected. A split or panel that took
focus while `read_dir` was pending therefore received the listing, and
`prev` was captured from it too — with every preflight check passing,
because the captured window was still live and still held its captured
buffer. Both sites now read the captured window: `display` routes to it
with `select = true` (the later `seat_cursor` acts on the active
window), and the `prev` read asks it directly.
N4c pins both halves. The suite's existing routing pins all varied
*frontend* identity; none varied the selected window within one
frontend, which is exactly why 23 green pins missed this. Bite: dired's
`display` back to `switch_buffer` fails N4c alone; `prev` read from the
ambient window fails N4c alone.
Two stale documentation claims, both of which this PR was supposed to
have already fixed:
* **The §0 scorecard still graded §2 "Broken at entry"** while §2's own
ground truth had been rewritten. The scorecard is a second copy of the
same claim and §25's protocol covers both. §19's row and ground truth
were stale the same way — this PR creates the first cross-subsystem
suite, which §19 says should exist and grades as missing — and are
corrected too.
* **P4 still read "leaves exactly one buffer"**, the exact claim rev 6
corrected as false everywhere else in the framing. Restated to what it
actually pins: the file is in the *active window*. The test was
already written correctly; only the framing lied.
Framing rev 8.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Completes Journey Stage 1a: the `commit_to` acceptance suite (framing
§6 N4, N6, N6b, N6c, P1, P2, P3) plus the documentation updates
COHERENCE §25 requires the PR to carry.
Bite-testing the new pins found a real gap. Deleting the
`ScopedFrontend` arm from `acting_frontend` left N4 green, because
`ScopedFrontend::enter` also swaps `core.active_frontend` and the
ambient fallback then answers correctly on its own. The arm is
load-bearing in exactly one case — a commit reached from inside an
interactive command, where the origin sits between the override and the
ambient value — and nothing pinned it. N4b is added, driven through
`dispatch_key` because that is the only thing that establishes an
interactive origin, and the mutation now bites it.
Two smaller corrections found the same way:
* `commit_to`'s forged-destination message was unreachable. Typed as
`AnyUserData`, mlua rejected a table during argument conversion, so a
caller got "error converting Lua table to userdata" — true, but naming
neither the rule nor the remedy. The parameter is now `mlua::Value`
and the pointed message fires.
* P1 and P2 also fail on full revert, since `commit_to` does not exist
on the pre-image, so §6.0's "legitimately green on the pre-image" does
not describe them. They stay in the P list because their
discriminating falsifier is the named mutation — a revert-only check
cannot distinguish "validates" from "validates in time" — and each pin
now says so at its own site rather than being silently mislabelled.
Bite results, each run against the whole suite:
scope stops swapping `core.active_frontend` -> N6a, P3 fail; nothing else
preflight moved after the callback -> P1, P2 fail; nothing else
drop the `ScopedFrontend` arm -> N4b fails; nothing else
Docs: COHERENCE §2 grade + step-3 verdict row, §20 Priority 1 and the
arc list; the GPU initial-target framing's Q#GT6 and acceptance 10,
whose directory case this stage deliberately supersedes; handoff §1;
the active-work ledger; framing rev 7.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Four review findings, all confirmed against the tree.
Q#JR3 was false. `replace_active_buffer` does not drop the startup
scratch buffer -- its body is one `switch_active_buffer` call, which
reassigns the window's buffer_id and removes nothing. The claim came
from that function's own doc comment, wrong for as long as it has
existed, and rev 5 propagated it into the framing and into new
documentation this branch added. Both comments are corrected here,
because this PR was adding further false references to a claim P4
depends on. Actually removing the stale scratch is buffer-lifetime work
and stays out.
The daemon bootstrap could report the wrong buffer. The directory arm
captured the destination id, ran the resolver chain synchronously, then
returned the captured id -- so a handler that opened something
synchronously through commit_to had already replaced the window's
buffer, and the reply paired one buffer's snapshot with another's
identity. It also returned early, skipping the post-hook revalidation
the framing said stayed active. The arm now re-reads the destination
after dispatch and rehomes through `non_side_target` as the file arm
does. Pinned by a test whose handler claims synchronously.
N11 tested neither RET nor self-insert: it called display_file and
buf:insert directly, so it stayed green with dired's RET binding, its
entry dispatch, and the editor's self-insert path all broken. Both
gestures now go through dispatch_key.
P7 is removed rather than weakened. Q#JR12 has nothing to pin --
`had_file = file.is_some()` and a directory is Some like any other, so
no directory-specific branch exists to break. The old test never armed
restore and hard-coded had_file, so it could not fail against any
implementation.
Also adds the daemon bootstrap pins (N2, N5) and fixes an insertion that
had orphaned a `#[cfg(feature = "crdt")]` from the test it guarded --
which would have made one new test dark and one existing test escape its
gate.
Framing: docs/journey-stage1a-framing.md rev 6.
Serves COHERENCE.md §2 (the golden product journey), §19 (coherence
acceptance tests), and §20 Priority 1, which grades the journey broken
at step 3 because `pmacs .` exits 1.
Stage 1a ships four things: the directory argument routed into dired's
buffer on both the local and daemon/GPU startup paths; EditorState::open
adopting resolve_target_buffer so the two path-open implementations
become one; a scoped-destination commit primitive so an async open lands
where it was requested or nowhere; and the first cross-subsystem journey
acceptance suite.
Framing only -- no implementation. Rev 5 after four review rounds.
Levi Neuwirth