Review round 2 confirmed everything central from round 1 as fixed and
raised four P1s. All four accepted; both requested sweeps run. Rebased
onto `7586905`.
P1-1, the ownership boundary was stale. Revision 2 described PR #171 as
"OPEN, STALE, 153 commits behind, under re-scout" claiming the rename
side only. Re-checked directly: #171 is at revision 7, `fd7ae37`,
merge-base `ad41cf1`, zero commits behind, and its revision 6 had
assigned rename AND delete to Stage 2a with the opposite policy --- file
deleted, modified buffer kept alive and orphaned, that orphaning named
as accepted residue. Two lanes, opposite answers, same event. The
settled split is now carried verbatim in the framing and the ledger, and
#171 revision 7 has adopted it from its side.
P1-2, the LSP failure-handling claim was wrong. The spec does not assign
`Abort` to resource-op-bearing edits. Recovery is described by the
client's advertised `workspace.workspaceEdit.failureHandling`; `Abort`
is one of four strategies, `Transactional` covers all operations, `Undo`
attempts rollback, and only `TextOnlyTransactional` degrades to abort
when resource changes are present. pmacs advertises none, so the spec
assigns pmacs no strategy at all. Section 1.7 and B2 now rest on
verified repository behaviour --- the reproduced partial batch --- not
on borrowed protocol authority.
P1-3, Q#RD7 had no implementable seam. Three gaps confirmed by reading:
`_parse_workspace_edit` is called one line above `apply_workspace_edit`
and is fallible, so the proposed wrap left "always answers" untrue;
`append_to_errors_buffer` is private and a Lua preflight rejection never
reaches Rust, so the promised logging was not implementable from where
it was promised; and acceptance 13 tested the response but not the
trace. Q#RD7 is rewritten around one seam at the server-request
boundary, and of the two options offered this revision picks wrapping
parse-plus-apply rather than narrowing the claim.
P1-4, clean duplicate reconciliation is now Q#RD10: validate every
match, reconcile today's first exact-path match only. Widening would
enlarge the parked lifecycle defect Q#RD5 exists to contain; the
surviving clean duplicate is named as residue handed to #171.
External-claim sweep. Every non-repo claim is now listed in a new
section 1.15 with its evidence. One was a paraphrase standing in for a
quote: "in Emacs `kill-buffer` on a modified file-visiting buffer
prompts". It is true, but the gate is `INTERACTIVE`, defined as
`(NILP (Vexecuting_kbd_macro) && !noninteractive)` --- keyboard present,
not `call-interactively` --- so eglot's programmatic kill does prompt in
a normal session and does not in batch or during a keyboard macro. The
revision 2 sentence was right for a reason it never established and
false in two environments it never considered.
Cross-lane sweep. Q#RD8 said mode (d) needs its own lane; it has one now
--- #171's `reconcile_delete` composes both removal phases. Q#RD6 claims
the shared walk query explicitly so the duplicate resolves in one
direction. And `pmacs.fs.remove`, guarded by neither lane and verified
to have zero production callers, is named as explicitly out of scope
with its owner rather than left to read as covered.
Still PROPOSED. No runtime code. Implementation begins only after
explicit user approval.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Lv428Fth9LRtffwJSsqH7T
Review round 1 approved the refusal strategy in principle and rejected
revision 1 as written. Six blocking points, all accepted, plus three
further overclaims found by the requested sweep. Q#RD1 and Q#RD5 are
settled yes; Q#RD9 is settled no and is withdrawn.
Q#RD2 conflated inspection with removal. Revision 1 removed the buffer
before the filesystem call, which fires arbitrary Lua `on_removed`
callbacks while the file still exists and accepts losing the buffer if
the deletion then fails. The sequence is now `stat/no-op -> enumerate
and validate -> mutate filesystem -> reconcile`. Validation inspects
`is_modified` and `editing_in_progress` without removing anything, so a
failed deletion leaves buffers intact automatically and `on_removed`
still observes the path already gone.
Q#RD3 overclaimed whole-batch atomicity. `documentChanges` are
sequential, so an earlier edit can dirty a clean buffer and an earlier
rename can move a modified buffer into a later delete's subtree, after
the snapshot. LSP 3.18 assigns `FailureHandlingKind.Abort` to any edit
containing resource changes --- "all operations executed before the
failing operation stay executed" --- so the protocol itself declines to
promise what revision 1 claimed. The preflight is now described as an
early conflict check, with robustness coming from per-op `pcall`, an
always-sent server response, and best-effort origin restore.
The lookup cannot be `EditorCore::find_buffer_for_path`: it normalizes
but delegates to the first-match-only `find_by_path`, and
`pmacs.buffer.from_file` creates path-bound buffers with no dedup, so a
clean first match can hide a modified second. Q#RD6 now requires a full
scan with component-aware `Path::starts_with`.
Recursive deletion now inspects the tree but reconciles only the exact
path, so the parked lifecycle defect stays exact-path rather than
becoming tree-wide. Q#RD4 holds at both layers, so the preflight cannot
reject an absent path the primitive treats as a no-op.
The prompt argument was overclaimed and that was my error.
`pmacs.lsp.send_response` takes `request_id` as an ordinary value, so a
`workspace/applyEdit` can be answered on a later tick, and a callback
continuation would reuse the existing minibuffer shadow rather than add
a seventh dispatcher rung. Prompting is expensive and separately
scoped, not impossible; the section now claims only what the evidence
carries.
Sweep found three more of the same defect class --- an absence or a
guarantee asserted rather than established:
* a durable error surface does exist (`append_to_errors_buffer` ->
`*errors*`), so Q#RD7 now records the refusal there as well;
* no caller reliably surfaces a raise, because the async path routes
uncaught coroutine errors through the undefined `pmacs.error`;
* pmacs advertises no `workspace.workspaceEdit` capability at all ---
no `documentChanges`, no `resourceOperations`, no
`failureHandling`.
Adds seven acceptance pins with their bite obligations, adds the
`docs/active-work.md` lane the ledger requires for every open PR, and
drops the two-PR plan: #186 is revised in place and becomes the
implementation PR.
Still PROPOSED. No runtime code. Implementation begins only after
explicit user approval.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Lv428Fth9LRtffwJSsqH7T
`pmacs.buffer.apply_resource_op`'s delete arm removes the file from
disk and then unconditionally drops any buffer bound to that path.
There is no dirty check at any link in the chain --- not in the arm,
not in `remove_buffer_and_fire`, and not in `BufferRegistry::remove`,
whose only guard is `editing_in_progress`. A buffer with unsaved edits
is destroyed and the file that would have held them is already gone.
Reachable today through any language server's `WorkspaceEdit`.
Reproduced four ways against `ad41cf1`, by throwaway tests run in this
worktree and removed before commit:
a. the reported bug --- op returns `Ok(())`, file gone, buffer gone;
b. `ignore_if_not_exists = true` does zero filesystem work and still
destroys the buffer (the `create` arm's early return was never
applied to delete);
c. `recursive = true` reconciles nothing, so a whole tree leaves
orphaned buffers --- the most destructive arm does the least
reconciliation, and it bypasses any exact-path guard;
d. removal is not `kill_buffer`: windows are left bound to a removed
`BufferId` and the registry can be driven to empty.
Recommends refusing before touching disk, at two layers: the Rust
primitive reconciles the registry first so the guard is expressible at
all, and the applier's existing URI preflight gains a second
precondition so the whole batch aborts with its documented
`nil, message` contract rather than half-applying.
Prompting is rejected on evidence: prompts are callback-continuations
resumed by a later keystroke, so a synchronous Rust binding cannot
issue one; the alternative is a seventh dispatcher shadow; and the
server-initiated path must answer `workspace/applyEdit` synchronously
with no user turn available. Backing up is rejected because removing
the buffer purges its autosave recovery file. Emacs prior art (eglot's
`do-delete`) kills the buffer before deleting the file and confirms
server-initiated edits as a whole-batch decision taken before any
mutation --- the same shape, in the phase pmacs already has.
Framing only. No runtime code. PROPOSED --- needs explicit user
approval before implementation.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Lv428Fth9LRtffwJSsqH7T
Levi Neuwirth