Docs only, and the first commit on the 1a branch. **No ruling changes.**
**1a needs no framing of its own** ---
`docs/gui-stage1-input-framing.md` already governs every Stage 1 slice,
and A1-A9, the eight Q#S1-9 precedence rules, §8's wire contract and
§11's gates are ruled there. What 1a does need is §2 to be TRUE, and it
was measured at `a994f37`, before 1-pre moved almost every GPU-side
coordinate in it. A framing whose ground truth points at the wrong lines
is how an implementation ends up arguing with the tree.
Re-measured at `4f77491`, and split by kind rather than renumbered
wholesale, because the two are not the same claim:
STILL TRUE `FrontendEvent`'s sixteen variants, `PROTOCOL_VERSION =
23`, IME's zero occurrences, the TUI wheel arms (1-pre
touched only `pmacs-gpu`), the handshake preceding the
window, and `Outbox::enqueue`'s closed-return.
MOVED `window_event` `:2734`/655 lines -> `:4450`/FOUR lines;
`translate_key` `:10975` -> `:12053`; "eight arms, rest
fall to `_`" -> three family decision functions over nine
variants. **1a edits `apply_keyboard` and
`translate_key`, not `window_event`.**
**TWO CLAIMS WERE WRONG AT BOTH ANCHORS, so they are corrections rather
than drift.**
**"`KeyEvent.text` is never read" is false, and was false at `a994f37`
too** (`:2800` there, `main.rs:3251` now): the AltGr rule reads it via
`is_layout_text(key.text.as_deref(), pmods)`. The true claim is
narrower and is the one that matters --- **`text` is never read as the
text a keypress INSERTS**, only as a discriminator separating AltGr from
a command chord.
That is load-bearing for A5 rather than cosmetic. §5's rule 2 already
exempts "printable Ctrl+Alt recognized by the existing AltGr rule", so
the precedence table depends on code the section claimed did not exist.
**1a widens `text` from discriminator to payload, and that is the actual
change of kind** --- which "text is never read" hid, along with the one
place the new payload must leave undisturbed.
**A4's exit site moved without its behaviour changing.** 1-pre routed
the idle-Escape quit through `EventOutcome`, so **A4 edits a branch and
a return type in `apply_keyboard` (`main.rs:3219`) and does not touch
`window_event`**, which holds the crate's only executable
`event_loop.exit()` (`main.rs:4452`). And **`EventOutcome` survives
A4**: a native close still returns `Exit`.
The lane records the v24 serialization constraint and the bump's blast
radius up front --- eight version-sensitive failures across six suites
on the last bump, of which CI showed one, because cargo stops at the
first failing target --- together with the rule for sorting them and the
pin that must never fire, `ADVERTISED_PROTOCOL_VERSION == 20`.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Two review findings, one of them a real defect.
**THE SENTINEL READ COULD HANG FOREVER.** `read_until_sentinel` blocked
with no bound, so a writer or encoder that regressed after `enqueue`
would WEDGE THE GATE rather than redden it --- and a hang is the worst
failure shape there is, because it looks like slowness until the job is
killed. A 30 s `READ_CEILING` is armed on the daemon socket.
The distinction is kept explicit in the code, because collapsing it is
how this fix would undo the design it protects: **the sentinel remains
the success condition and the ceiling is only an error ceiling.**
Arrival is still decided by the sentinel, so the harness never infers
"nothing was sent" from a duration --- the core-count assumption behind
PR #235's CI red is not reintroduced. The ceiling sits far above any
plausible drain, so reaching it means broken, never busy.
M24 proves it fires rather than trusting it: drop the sentinel enqueue
entirely and the row fails in under a second with a diagnostic naming
both candidate causes and the partial transcript, instead of hanging.
**THE STAGE 1a CONSEQUENCE WAS WRONG IN FOUR PLACES.** Every record
claimed A4 would leave `EventOutcome` with one variant, so the type
should go with the Escape branch. It will not, and it should not.
`LifecycleRoute::Exit` --- a native window close --- returns
`EventOutcome::Exit` too. A4 removes the KEYBOARD producer only, leaving
one `Exit` producer.
And **one producer is not one variant**: the type survives because
`dispatch_window_event` must still distinguish `Continue` from `Exit` on
every event it handles --- nearly all must not exit, and the close must.
What A4 actually changes is `apply_keyboard`'s signature. Corrected in
the `EventOutcome` doc, the Escape-branch comment, the framing and the
ledger; the framing's superseded paragraph is deleted rather than
patched, since it also carried the stale "two `event_loop.exit()`
call sites" count. **There is exactly one executable
`event_loop.exit()`**, in `window_event`.
Also: the sentinel-tag comment claimed four modifier bits and used
three. It now says three, wrapping every eight steps, and why that
suffices --- each sentinel is read before the next is issued, so a tag
only has to differ from its immediate predecessor.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Revision 10 argued a route-classification transcript satisfied P2
because a route 'names its local effect'. The wheel falsifies it: a
wheel route carries a delta, and whether that becomes a viewport
update, a panel event, a terminal event or nothing at all depends on
State. The route names the family; only running the body names the
effect. Retracted rather than quietly amended, since it was an argument
this document made and review overturned.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Three documents, one finding each.
**`docs/gui-stage1-input-framing.md` -> revision 10.** Revision 9 is the
approved design and revision 10 changes none of it. It records ONE scope
correction that could not be seen from the design: P1 has a second
structural exception, for the keyboard family alone, and it is winit's
rather than this seam's. `KeyEvent` carries a `pub(crate)
platform_specific` field, so no `WindowEvent::KeyboardInput` can be
constructed outside winit. Bounded three ways rather than accepted
whole --- it does not reach the pointer families (`DeviceId::dummy()`
exists for exactly this, checked BEFORE writing the exception down), the
family's only decision is factored into `route_key_action` and witnessed
directly, and what stays uncovered is one pattern arm with no logic.
Also records that P3 is now MEASURED: deleting the whole delegation
leaves all 256 `pmacs-gpu` tests green, not merely the 13 new rows.
**`docs/active-work.md`** --- the lane moves to IMPLEMENTED with the
four commits, the shape, the verbatim-move method, and the gate result.
**`docs/agent-handoff.md`** --- the stray-marker hazard gains what this
run earned: `scripts/gate` DOES NOT ISOLATE `TMPDIR`. It isolates the
target directory and five ambient roots, so `tempfile::tempdir()` still
lands under whatever `/tmp` happens to contain, and the hazard therefore
reproduces INSIDE a gate run --- which is how it surfaced here, on a
lane that touches only `pmacs-gpu/src/main.rs`. The bullet now carries
the discriminating command pair (`TMPDIR=/tmp` 0/2 versus a marker-free
root 2/2) rather than only the narrative, because a rerun establishes
nothing about this and the pair establishes everything. Isolating
`TMPDIR` is assigned to the gate lane, not to whichever feature PR trips
over it next.
One code change rides along: `EventOutcome`'s doc comment said
`event_loop.exit()` is called in "exactly one place", which is true of
the function and false of the call sites --- there are two, both inside
`window_event`. Stated precisely now, since the whole point of the
sentence is that a reader can check it by grep.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
The framing and the lane are this branch's FIRST commit, which is the
arc's §5 rule for every PR in it and the reason this branch exists
before any code: revision 9 was approved as an untracked file, and an
approved framing that lives in one worktree is not portable.
Revision 9 landed after EIGHT rejected revisions. The through-line of
those rounds is worth carrying: each early draft turned a fresh source
audit into SCOPE LABELS --- "DroppedFile", "translate_key completion",
"no behaviour change" --- and review kept asking the same question,
which is what the label means when someone has to test it. Revision 9 is
a contract/witness/mutation matrix over every numbered clause, split
into CHANGE clauses that fail today and PRESERVATION clauses that pass
and must keep passing.
Several findings only existed because the contracts were written down.
"Send Detach before exit" was unexecutable against an outbox whose
`enqueue` rejects once closed. A one-slot terminal reservation
contradicted the FocusLost-before-Detach ordering two sections above it.
"Terminal result after the commit resolves" was not total over a
pipeline with three legitimate exits that never commit --- a claimed
listener, a cleared handler slot, and the default handler's `open_async`
returning immediately. None of those are visible from a scope label.
This branch is 1-pre ALONE: the input seam, no behaviour change. Its
evidence is a headless routing harness recording routing decisions,
outbound events AND local effects, with production `window_event` as a
thin call-through. P3 is recorded as an accepted structural exception:
a headless test cannot construct `ActiveEventLoop`, so the delegation
itself is a code-review invariant rather than a tested one, and saying
so is better than a mutation that cannot exist.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Levi Neuwirth