Review round 3 accepted the core --- pre-filesystem refusal, four-phase
ordering, the #171 split, Q#RD10 --- and raised four P1s and a P2. All
accepted.
The external-claim audit added in revision 3 certified this document as
clean while Q#RD3, the normative decision, still asserted the very LSP
claim the audit's own row 4 marked WITHDRAWN. It did so because it
checked each claim where it was DEFINED and never at the sites that
CONSUMED it, so a withdrawal recorded in one section coexisted with the
same claim doing load-bearing work three sections away. That is a defect
in the audit procedure rather than a missed line, and since the table is
now an artifact readers trust, section 1.15 records both the failure and
the corrected procedure: grep the whole document per row and check every
hit.
P1, lane state. Re-measured: `git rev-list --left-right --count
fd7ae37...7586905` returns `13 2`, so #171 is two commits behind, not
zero, and those two are exactly PR #189's COHERENCE change. Revision 3's
"0 behind" was taken against `ad41cf1` and reported in present tense
after main had moved. Both ledger lane entries are corrected in place
--- #186's revision and base, and #171's superseded `ab42a79` /
153-behind / merge-base-`c8ec8f3` ground truth --- rather than having a
correction layered above stale text, which is what made the ledger
self-contradicting. Every count now appears as pasted command output.
P1, withdrawn claim surviving. Q#RD3 called partial application
`FailureHandlingKind.Abort`, "the strategy the spec itself assigns to
any edit containing resource changes", and section 1.11 called `Abort`
the default "by omission". The spec establishes no default for a client
advertising no strategy. Both sites now say only that verified pmacs
behaviour resembles abort-style application, resting on the reproduction
in section 1.6.
P1, acceptance 15. `WorkspaceEditResponse::from_lsp_value` returns
`Self`, its doc says a shapeless result yields an empty response, and
the binding's only `?` is `lua_to_json` over a value that arrived
through `json_to_lua` --- so no server payload can make the parse fail
and the criterion could not fail. Decision, new Q#RD11: keep the wrap,
drive the test with an explicit throwing stub, label it defensive.
Q#RD7's promise narrows to "always attempts a response while the
response channel remains live", since `send_response` is itself under an
ignored `pcall`.
P1, absent-plus-ignore. `pmacs.fs.stat` dispatches async and
`canonicalize` resolves symlinks and returns nil for a dangling one, so
it disagrees with the primitive's `symlink_metadata` on exactly the
input this query turns on. New Q#RD12 specifies a structured Rust-backed
verdict --- no-op / clear / conflict --- evaluated with the same
`symlink_metadata` call, with an error contract that fails toward
refusal. New criteria 11a and 11b supply the missing opposite direction.
P2. Criterion 14's "fails in both directions" was false: with both
duplicates clean the setup cannot distinguish first-match validation
from full validation. The claim is fixed rather than the setup, because
criterion 6 already pins validation breadth. Section 8's touch table and
section 7's gate list are reconciled.
Sweep for corrections applied at one site while a dependent site kept
the old claim: count 4 --- the two `Abort` sites above, and the stale
#171 count in both the revision history and section 1.12. Nine other
withdrawn or revised claims were checked at every consuming site and
found clean.
Still PROPOSED. No runtime code. Implementation begins only after
explicit user approval.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Lv428Fth9LRtffwJSsqH7T
Levi Neuwirth
46b3c8db1a