Closes review round 1 — 2 blocking, 3 high, 3 revision points — and
rebases the ground truth onto `main` @ `d152120`.
Both blockers were rev 1 asserting something the parent framing
already decided otherwise:
- **R1-1.** Rev 1 said all 23 census reads route through
`primary_document_window`. Q#BP14 routes only the **Projection**
class that way; focus/input (#13-#15, #23), focus chrome and
surface-routed (#16-#19), and focus/session (#20) keep their own
authorities. Rev 1's rule would have broken remote-op validation and
application, `DispatchIdle`, presence, focused search/menu/completion
routing, and terminal bell ownership. §3.2 restores the four classes
as a table and the acceptance asserts each separately — the
focus-class assertions are the load-bearing half, since a test that
only proves "the document is used" passes with them wrongly
rerouted.
- **R1-2.** The three `src/statusline.rs` active reads have two
dispositions, not one. Only `:644` selects the wrong window; `:629`
and `:675` must keep tracking actual focus, because grid contexts
need a truthful `active`, revalidation must notice a focus change,
and parent acceptance 42 requires a document provider to be able to
observe `active = false` while the panel is focused.
The three high findings:
- Q#BP2S1 resolves to frontend-owned epochs (option 1) — a font or
scale transaction can need to invalidate an old `PanelFrame` while
the derived `CellSize` is identical, which daemon value dedup cannot
detect. Rev 2 adds the four-row transition table, splits grid
allocation from semantic acceptance into two APIs rather than one
ambiguous method, moves the grid allocator off `saturating_add` to
checked-with-fail-closed, and defines the initial epoch and both
exhaustion behaviors. Rev 1's "rejects a lower-or-equal epoch
carrying different data" was itself wrong: a lower epoch carrying
identical data is still stale.
- The `panel_capable` flip is narrowed to an authenticated semantic
session negotiated at **v21 or later**. Denying a v20 peer the new
events is insufficient if the daemon still places its window in a
side panel it cannot render — the gate is on placement.
- Parent acceptance criteria 37-55 are declared authoritative and
mapped to slices 2A/2B, with rev 1's eleven drafts demoted to
refinements. The painter-extraction criterion now pins cells, the
returned cursor, the focused window's `view_top` mutation, and
passive-window state.
All four scout obligations are closed (§5), and the pixel formula is
treated as contract work, not implementation detail:
- The shared/terminal-only validator boundary is named exactly.
- Four new outbox tail-coalescing tags beside the existing four.
- **`State::mono_advance` is unsafe to adopt**: absent a `FontFacts`
probe it samples the document's first shaped glyph, which would make
panel columns document-dependent. The declaration uses the existing
stable normal-face `probe_mono_advance` instead, and declares zero
usable geometry when it returns `None`.
- `BASE_DIVIDER_HEIGHT` does not exist. Rev 2 decides its scaling and
requires **one** document-bottom accessor routing every consumer
(caret, hits, minimap, terminal geometry, clipping, edge scrolling)
— a second unrouted seam is precisely the Stage 1 `Layout::compute`
two-caller defect. The concrete base value is left open for round 2.
Also: the coherence statement now names journey steps 7-10 instead of
claiming none, and drops rev 1's overclaim that this advances
background-work visibility — a panel gives output a placement but adds
no join key to COHERENCE §9's four disjoint activity planes.
The ledger's bottom-panel lane is updated from "no branch and no
framing yet" to the framing's real state, and carries an explicit
correction: that entry was itself the source of rev 1's census
mis-statement.
Factual corrections: `InitialTargetResult` is at `message.rs:1145`;
`primary_document_window` has four references and two production paths
(`daemon.rs:1639`, and `daemon.rs:2998` via `primary_document_buffer`,
which is census #22); fifteen PRs merged since the parent's last
re-scout, not eleven.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Levi Neuwirth
69f9a1bdf9