Four blocking gaps, all of them cases where revision 14 asserted a
guarantee its own mechanism did not provide.
1. Q#BP-R4's release half was bookkeeping in an effect's clothes. It
ruled that a chrome Up "consumes" the latch and claimed this stops a
child being left button-down. It stops nothing: update_accepted_gesture
does `let _ = state.consume_accepted_gesture()` at daemon.rs:1067, and
terminal chrome returns at editor.rs:2862-2870, BEFORE
apply_terminal_gesture at :2899. P3/P4 asserted only that the latch
empties, so they would have passed while the child heard nothing ---
the failure looking fixed because the bookkeeping looked right. Now
ruled as TERMINATE, with a per-target completion effect (child release,
or local terminal-selection completion, or the document completion SS5b
already assigned here), a no-duplicate leg, and P3 written explicitly
against the latch-only assertion.
2. The pending-release slot had an invariant and no ordering. The seam
replays before it arms (daemon.rs:2608-2616), so a check inside
arm_accepted_gesture could only fire after the new press had already
reached the child. Drain order is now part of the ruling: before any
subsequent panel-pointer effect, before detach teardown, before the
next frame --- with an old-release-before-new-press row that reads the
child's byte order, and the invariant demoted to a backstop.
3. The ground truth was knowingly false, and the workflow requires
scouting before framing. RE-MEASURED at 2c0d3ff instead of deferred.
Two clauses the old table called MISSING are DONE on this branch ---
panel selection and terminal mouse reporting --- the vertical wheel
works, and the horizontal wheel turns out to be an UNRULED gap sitting
in a catch-all arm with no comment. Revision 15 names it rather than
ruling it, because inventing a ruling inside a re-measurement is how an
unexamined default becomes a decision. The 72da24a table is kept as
history.
4. "This lane MOVES the grade" was wrong against the authoritative
scorecard. Step 5/GPU is floored Partial by 5(a) IME, so completing
5(c) cannot lift it, and step 8 is already Works on all three columns.
The draft had read this section's MISSING column as if it were the
scorecard; COHERENCE.md is the only thing that decides grades.
Also drops a false TUI claim --- dispatch_semantic_panel_pointer has
exactly two callers, both FrontendEvent arms, so only semantic legacy and
mapped peers reach it --- and clears two merged-state contradictions: SS5b
no longer says "Nothing implemented", and the lane no longer says the v26
correction is owed by 1b while the block below records SS5b making it.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Levi Neuwirth
cda078fa91