Review round 1 approved the refusal strategy in principle and rejected
revision 1 as written. Six blocking points, all accepted, plus three
further overclaims found by the requested sweep. Q#RD1 and Q#RD5 are
settled yes; Q#RD9 is settled no and is withdrawn.
Q#RD2 conflated inspection with removal. Revision 1 removed the buffer
before the filesystem call, which fires arbitrary Lua `on_removed`
callbacks while the file still exists and accepts losing the buffer if
the deletion then fails. The sequence is now `stat/no-op -> enumerate
and validate -> mutate filesystem -> reconcile`. Validation inspects
`is_modified` and `editing_in_progress` without removing anything, so a
failed deletion leaves buffers intact automatically and `on_removed`
still observes the path already gone.
Q#RD3 overclaimed whole-batch atomicity. `documentChanges` are
sequential, so an earlier edit can dirty a clean buffer and an earlier
rename can move a modified buffer into a later delete's subtree, after
the snapshot. LSP 3.18 assigns `FailureHandlingKind.Abort` to any edit
containing resource changes --- "all operations executed before the
failing operation stay executed" --- so the protocol itself declines to
promise what revision 1 claimed. The preflight is now described as an
early conflict check, with robustness coming from per-op `pcall`, an
always-sent server response, and best-effort origin restore.
The lookup cannot be `EditorCore::find_buffer_for_path`: it normalizes
but delegates to the first-match-only `find_by_path`, and
`pmacs.buffer.from_file` creates path-bound buffers with no dedup, so a
clean first match can hide a modified second. Q#RD6 now requires a full
scan with component-aware `Path::starts_with`.
Recursive deletion now inspects the tree but reconciles only the exact
path, so the parked lifecycle defect stays exact-path rather than
becoming tree-wide. Q#RD4 holds at both layers, so the preflight cannot
reject an absent path the primitive treats as a no-op.
The prompt argument was overclaimed and that was my error.
`pmacs.lsp.send_response` takes `request_id` as an ordinary value, so a
`workspace/applyEdit` can be answered on a later tick, and a callback
continuation would reuse the existing minibuffer shadow rather than add
a seventh dispatcher rung. Prompting is expensive and separately
scoped, not impossible; the section now claims only what the evidence
carries.
Sweep found three more of the same defect class --- an absence or a
guarantee asserted rather than established:
* a durable error surface does exist (`append_to_errors_buffer` ->
`*errors*`), so Q#RD7 now records the refusal there as well;
* no caller reliably surfaces a raise, because the async path routes
uncaught coroutine errors through the undefined `pmacs.error`;
* pmacs advertises no `workspace.workspaceEdit` capability at all ---
no `documentChanges`, no `resourceOperations`, no
`failureHandling`.
Adds seven acceptance pins with their bite obligations, adds the
`docs/active-work.md` lane the ledger requires for every open PR, and
drops the two-PR plan: #186 is revised in place and becomes the
implementation PR.
Still PROPOSED. No runtime code. Implementation begins only after
explicit user approval.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Lv428Fth9LRtffwJSsqH7T
Levi Neuwirth
e1e9b44154