Answers review of 39b6fa7. The three-state disposition was sound; the
record and effect half downstream of it were not.
apply_panel_pointer returned a bare bool, so the record carried neither
the resolved target nor the reporting contract, and the daemon drove
accepted Drag/Up back through the mode-sensitive adapter. That adapter
re-reads Shift, the scrollback position and the child's mouse modes on
every event --- which is G5k's named mutation verbatim. A press reported
to the child followed by a release re-evaluated after the child turned
reporting off leaves that child holding a button down; the reverse
transition sends a child an Up for a Down it never saw. The recorded
completion had the same defect and additionally re-derived the current
side window, returning when it had changed --- precisely the transitions
task 19 must terminate, so the completion they need was the one thing
that refused to run.
The press now resolves a PanelGestureDomain --- Document{window},
TerminalChild{window, buffer, modes} or TerminalLocal{window, buffer}
--- and the record carries it. Tails and completions route through
replay_panel_gesture_in_domain, which gates on nothing: not Shift, not
the scroll position, not the child's current modes, not the panel's
current identity. apply_terminal_gesture reports which way it routed so
the domain is measured where the branch is taken. Arming now requires an
effect: a press the target refused records nothing.
G5k(a)-(d) plus P3's reporting leg, P4 and P5. Every row reads a TARGET
EFFECT --- the child's byte stream in order, the terminal drag state, or
the document selection --- never the latch. Each bites its own mutation,
and G5k's four legs all fail under the framing's own named mutation
applied verbatim.
Two seams exist because nothing else exposes what the child received: an
opt-in child-input tap, off by default, and a drag-state read.
Also corrects the recovery ledger, which still said implementation was
paused and the bool collision unfixed.
Records for the ci-red registry rather than hiding it: during this work
composition_overhead_under_ten_percent and pty_mode_child_sees_a_tty
redded together in one --lib run at load 21 and each passed in isolation
immediately after --- U9's signature, and neither path is touched here.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
Levi Neuwirth
48057d7667