docs(lane): point at teardown framing revision 9

The held lane still identified the teardown framing as revision 8, so
the approved state was not portable from this branch. Revision 9 adds
the total run classifier, the void budget, the endpoint verdict table,
the bisect-step policy and counterbalanced ordering --- none of which a
reader arriving here would have found.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
This commit is contained in:
Levi Neuwirth 2026-08-19 10:41:30 +02:00
parent 6b0ad8e5dd
commit 08588361a5
No known key found for this signature in database
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -500,8 +500,8 @@ from #171 and #215.
enumerated with its own log digest in the teardown lane's
`docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`.
- **The defect now has its own lane:
`gpu-probe-sigint-teardown`** (pushed; framing revision 8 at
`docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md` (revision 8), run provenance at
`gpu-probe-sigint-teardown`** (pushed; framing revision 9 at
`docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md` (revision 9), run provenance at
`docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`). **§5b is held behind it.** That
lane's framing supersedes every diagnostic claim below; the entries
here are kept only as the record of how it was found.