docs(lane): point at teardown framing revision 9
The held lane still identified the teardown framing as revision 8, so the approved state was not portable from this branch. Revision 9 adds the total run classifier, the void budget, the endpoint verdict table, the bisect-step policy and counterbalanced ordering --- none of which a reader arriving here would have found. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
This commit is contained in:
parent
6b0ad8e5dd
commit
08588361a5
|
|
@ -500,8 +500,8 @@ from #171 and #215.
|
|||
enumerated with its own log digest in the teardown lane's
|
||||
`docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`.
|
||||
- **The defect now has its own lane:
|
||||
`gpu-probe-sigint-teardown`** (pushed; framing revision 8 at
|
||||
`docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md` (revision 8), run provenance at
|
||||
`gpu-probe-sigint-teardown`** (pushed; framing revision 9 at
|
||||
`docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md` (revision 9), run provenance at
|
||||
`docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`). **§5b is held behind it.** That
|
||||
lane's framing supersedes every diagnostic claim below; the entries
|
||||
here are kept only as the record of how it was found.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue