docs(lane): the ancestry pair is non-comparable; point at revision 7
Two corrections.
- This ledger still said 72da24a being an ancestor of the passing
7599661 while failing today is something "no source-monotonic cause
explains". Withdrawn: the two observations differ in commit AND
environment AND time, so they are non-comparable and support no
causal conclusion of any kind. Different commits can
deterministically produce different outcomes, so the pair says
nothing about determinism either.
- It identified the teardown lane's framing as revision 5; the
portable lane is revision 7.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
This commit is contained in:
parent
4751aa99e6
commit
c8ae975ed9
|
|
@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ from #171 and #215.
|
|||
`docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`.
|
||||
- **The defect now has its own lane:
|
||||
`gpu-probe-sigint-teardown`** (pushed; framing revision 5 at
|
||||
`docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md` (revision 5), run provenance at
|
||||
`docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md` (revision 7, `e2084fb`+), run provenance at
|
||||
`docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`). **§5b is held behind it.** That
|
||||
lane's framing supersedes every diagnostic claim below; the entries
|
||||
here are kept only as the record of how it was found.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue