docs(lane): the ancestry pair is non-comparable; point at revision 7

Two corrections.

  - This ledger still said 72da24a being an ancestor of the passing
    7599661 while failing today is something "no source-monotonic cause
    explains". Withdrawn: the two observations differ in commit AND
    environment AND time, so they are non-comparable and support no
    causal conclusion of any kind. Different commits can
    deterministically produce different outcomes, so the pair says
    nothing about determinism either.
  - It identified the teardown lane's framing as revision 5; the
    portable lane is revision 7.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_016bqGA6s9tTUFzYpbeW3tai
This commit is contained in:
Levi Neuwirth 2026-08-18 18:03:52 +02:00
parent 4751aa99e6
commit c8ae975ed9
No known key found for this signature in database
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -497,7 +497,7 @@ from #171 and #215.
`docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`. `docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`.
- **The defect now has its own lane: - **The defect now has its own lane:
`gpu-probe-sigint-teardown`** (pushed; framing revision 5 at `gpu-probe-sigint-teardown`** (pushed; framing revision 5 at
`docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md` (revision 5), run provenance at `docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md` (revision 7, `e2084fb`+), run provenance at
`docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`). **§5b is held behind it.** That `docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`). **§5b is held behind it.** That
lane's framing supersedes every diagnostic claim below; the entries lane's framing supersedes every diagnostic claim below; the entries
here are kept only as the record of how it was found. here are kept only as the record of how it was found.