docs(framing): record revision 10 approval
Revision 10 is approved at 4fba9f6 after aligning A3 with the D0b
contingency. The demonstrated D1/D2 mechanism may account directly for
the subset/full difference; otherwise D0b remains mandatory before the
lane closes.
Record that diagnostic-only D1/D2 are authorised but have not started.
No mechanism or fix is claimed yet.
This commit is contained in:
parent
4fba9f6b44
commit
f058780a5d
|
|
@ -280,11 +280,13 @@ from #171 and #215.
|
|||
`/home/jeans/Repos/personal/pmacs-probe-sigint`. Recover with
|
||||
`git fetch githubsucks && git checkout gpu-probe-sigint-teardown`.
|
||||
- **No PR. Framing revision 10 at `docs/gpu-probe-sigint-framing.md`,
|
||||
AWAITING APPROVAL** — revision 9 was approved at `15c25ec`, but that
|
||||
approval does **not** cover retiring D0b, which changes the approved
|
||||
diagnostic sequence. **D1/D2 do not begin until revision 10 is
|
||||
approved.** Also: NO IMPLEMENTATION and no fix
|
||||
proposed** — the mechanism is not known yet, and the framing says so
|
||||
APPROVED 2026-08-19 at `4fba9f6`** — revision 9 was approved at
|
||||
`15c25ec`, but did **not** cover retiring D0b. Revision 10 does, with
|
||||
the A3 contingency preserved: if the demonstrated D1/D2 mechanism
|
||||
does not account for the subset/full difference, D0b runs before
|
||||
closure. **D1/D2 are authorised but have not started.** Also: **NO
|
||||
IMPLEMENTATION and no fix proposed** — the mechanism is not known yet,
|
||||
and the framing says so
|
||||
rather than guessing. Revisions 1, 2 and 3 were each rejected on
|
||||
findings, all upheld; run provenance lives in
|
||||
`docs/probe-sigint-evidence.md`.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,14 +1,15 @@
|
|||
# GPU launcher / probe SIGINT teardown — framing
|
||||
|
||||
Revision 10. Status: **AWAITING APPROVAL. No fix implemented;
|
||||
mechanism still unknown.**
|
||||
Revision 10. Status: **APPROVED 2026-08-19 at `4fba9f6`. No fix
|
||||
implemented; mechanism still unknown.**
|
||||
|
||||
Revision 9 was approved 2026-08-19 at `15c25ec`. **That approval does
|
||||
not extend to this revision**, because retiring D0b (§7) materially
|
||||
changes the approved diagnostic sequence — the approved text made D0b
|
||||
mandatory before every other diagnostic. D0a's execution and result
|
||||
(§4b) are reported under it, and D1/D2 do not begin until this revision
|
||||
is approved.
|
||||
Revision 9 was approved 2026-08-19 at `15c25ec`. **That approval did
|
||||
not extend to revision 10**, because retiring D0b (§7) materially
|
||||
changed the approved diagnostic sequence — the revision 9 text made
|
||||
D0b mandatory before every other diagnostic. Revision 10's approval
|
||||
covers that retirement and the A3 contingency that preserves its
|
||||
obligation. D0a's execution and result (§4b) are reported; D1/D2 are
|
||||
authorised but have not started.
|
||||
|
||||
Revisions 1 and 2 were each rejected on five findings. Every correction
|
||||
is recorded in place rather than quietly rewritten, because three of
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue